ITAC Assessment: UM0112
ITAC logo
ITAC Assessment: UM0112
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
Assessment Year 1998
Principal Product Metal Stampings
NAICS
n/a
SIC 3469: Metal Stampings, Not Elsewhere Classified
Sales Range $10
M
to 50
M
# of Employees 100
Plant Area 42,000
ft2
Annual Production 5,000,000
pieces
Production Hrs. Annual 4,335
hrs
Location (State) Michigan

Facility Energy Cost and Usage

Source Yearly Cost Usage
Electricity Usage $98,744 992,673
kWh
Electricity Fees $(-3,290.0) -
Natural Gas $163 35
MMBtu
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS -
RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* $14,069 *Non-energy impacts included in savings.
IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* $3,137

Recommendations

# Description Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Status Electricity Usage Savings Electricity Demand Savings Electricity Fees Savings
01 2.4133: Use most efficient type of electric motors $852 $1,450 $449
9,086
kWh
$403
-
kW-mo/yr
-
02 2.7142: Utilize higher efficiency lamps and/or ballasts $1,169 $2,110 $580
9,965
kWh
$589
-
kW-mo/yr
-
03 2.7135: Install occupancy sensors $407 $400 $407
7,034
kWh
- -
04 2.4221: Install compressor air intakes in coolest locations $1,116 $1,000 $1,116
19,343
kWh
- -
05 2.8114: Change rate schedules or other changes in utility service $10,525 $40,250 - - $10,525
TOTAL RECOMMENDED $14,069 $45,210 $2,552
45,428
kWh
$992
-
kW-mo/yr
$10,525
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED $3,137 $4,560 $2,145
38,394
kWh
$992
-
kW-mo/yr
-
*Savings and costs are best estimates based on the center's site visit, associated engineering analysis, and typical capital and labor costs