| Assessment Year | 1996 |
|---|---|
| Principal Product | Steel Tubing, Tail Pipes |
| NAICS |
n/a
|
| SIC | 3317: Steel Pipe and Tubes |
| Sales Range | $10 M to 50M |
| # of Employees | 250 |
| Plant Area |
80,000
ft2
|
| Annual Production | 0
pieces
|
| Production Hrs. Annual | 6,240
hrs
|
| Location (State) | Kentucky |
Facility Energy Cost and Usage
| Source | Yearly Cost | Usage | Unit Cost | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Electricity Usage | $84,632 | 3,095,838 |
kWh
|
$0.027 |
| Electricity Demand | $86,148 | 9,342 |
kW-mo/yr
|
$9.22 |
| TOTAL YEARLY COSTS | - | |||
| RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* | $38,236 |
See individual recommendations below
*Non-energy impacts included in savings.
|
||
| IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* | - | |||
Recommendations
| # | Description | Yearly Savings* | Imp'd Cost* | Status | Electricity Usage Savings | Electricity Demand Savings | Other Liquid (haz) Savings | Ancillary Material Cost Savings |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01 | 2.7142: Utilize higher efficiency lamps and/or ballasts | $295 | $1,548 |
$187
6,741
kWh
|
$108
-
kW-mo/yr
|
- | - | |
| 02 | 2.4133: Use most efficient type of electric motors | $160 | $3,080 |
$97
3,517
kWh
|
$63
-
kW-mo/yr
|
- | - | |
| 03 | 2.4231: Reduce the pressure of compressed air to the minimum required | $202 | $20 |
$88
2,345
kWh
|
$114
-
kW-mo/yr
|
- | - | |
| 04 | 2.4221: Install compressor air intakes in coolest locations | $289 | $35 |
$126
4,689
kWh
|
$163
-
kW-mo/yr
|
- | - | |
| 05 | 3.7214: Reduce or eliminate waste | $7,500 | $900 | - | - |
$7,500
-
gal
|
- | |
| 06 | 3.1191: Change procedures / equipment / operating conditions | $3,040 | $500 | - | - | - | $3,040 | |
| 07 | 3.1162: Use less wasteful packaging | $26,750 | $36,000 | - | - | - | $26,750 | |
| TOTAL RECOMMENDED | $38,236 | $42,083 |
$498
17,292
kWh
|
$448
-
kW-mo/yr
|
$7,500
-
gal
|
$29,790 | ||
| TOTAL IMPLEMENTED | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||
| Yearly Savings* | Imp'd Cost* | Electricity Usage Savings | Electricity Demand Savings | Other Liquid (haz) Savings | Ancillary Material Cost Savings | |||
*Savings and costs are best estimates based on the center's site visit, associated engineering analysis, and typical capital and labor costs