ITAC Assessment: UF0377
ITAC logo
ITAC Assessment: UF0377
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
Assessment Year 2006
Principal Product Corrugated Plastic Tubing
NAICS 326122: Plastics Pipe and Pipe Fitting Manufacturing
SIC 3084: Plastics Pipe
Sales Range $10
M
to 50
M
# of Employees 35
Plant Area 11,300
ft2
Annual Production 10,500,000
lb
Production Hrs. Annual 6,864
hrs
Location (State) Florida

Facility Energy Cost and Usage

Source Yearly Cost Usage
Electricity Usage $188,577 2,871,980
kWh
Electricity Demand $25,155 7,413
kW-mo/yr
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS -
RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* $661,267 *Non-energy impacts included in savings.
IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* -

Recommendations

# Description Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Status Electricity Usage Savings Electricity Demand Savings Personnel Changes Savings Administrative Changes Savings
01 2.4236: Eliminate leaks in inert gas and compressed air lines/ valves $2,493 $334 $2,493
31,555
kWh
- - -
02 2.7142: Utilize higher efficiency lamps and/or ballasts $493 $415 $480
4,118
kWh
$13
-
kW-mo/yr
- -
03 2.4221: Install compressor air intakes in coolest locations $5,064 - $5,064
64,098
kWh
- - -
04 2.4231: Reduce the pressure of compressed air to the minimum required $341 - $341
4,320
kWh
- - -
05 2.7124: Make a practice of turning off lights when not needed $542 $750 $542
7,744
kWh
- - -
06 2.4133: Use most efficient type of electric motors $14,507 $13,121 $13,490
192,718
kWh
$1,017
-
kW-mo/yr
- -
07 2.2628: Utilize a less expensive cooling method $3,877 $21,000 $2,307
32,947
kWh
$130
-
kW-mo/yr
$1,440 -
08 2.3417: Use waste heat with a closed-cycle gas turbine-generator set to cogenerate electricity and heat $626,232 $1,134,871 $613,200
8,760,000
kWh
$13,032
-
kW-mo/yr
- -
09 3.7221: Improve process control to prevent spills of material $4,718 $463 $602
7,623
kWh
- $4,116 -
10 3.5316: Contract a wood pallet recycling company $3,000 - - - - $3,000
TOTAL RECOMMENDED $661,267 $1,170,954 $638,519
9,105,123
kWh
$14,192
-
kW-mo/yr
$5,556 $3,000
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED - - - - - -
Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Electricity Usage Savings Electricity Demand Savings Personnel Changes Savings Administrative Changes Savings
*Savings and costs are best estimates based on the center's site visit, associated engineering analysis, and typical capital and labor costs