| Assessment Year | 2002 |
|---|---|
| Principal Product | Carbonated Soft Drinks |
| NAICS |
n/a
|
| SIC | 2086: Bottled and Canned Soft Drinks and Carbonated Waters |
| Sales Range | $10 M to 50M |
| # of Employees | 400 |
| Plant Area |
430,000
ft2
|
| Annual Production | 27,000,000
pieces
|
| Production Hrs. Annual | 7,488
hrs
|
| Location (State) | Florida |
Facility Energy Cost and Usage
| Source | Yearly Cost | Usage | Unit Cost | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Electricity Usage | $338,156 | 6,281,340 |
kWh
|
$0.054 |
| Electricity Demand | $106,133 | 14,639 |
kW-mo/yr
|
$7.25 |
| Natural Gas | $81,039 | 30,982 |
MMBtu
|
$2.62 |
| TOTAL YEARLY COSTS | - | |||
| RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* | $384,531 |
See individual recommendations below
*Non-energy impacts included in savings.
|
||
| IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* | - | |||
Recommendations
| # | Description | Yearly Savings* | Imp'd Cost* | Status | Electricity Usage Savings | Electricity Demand Savings | Natural Gas Savings | Water Disposal Savings | Personnel Changes Savings | Administrative Changes Savings | Primary Raw Material Savings | Primary Product Savings | Increase in Production Savings |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01 | 2.4133: Use most efficient type of electric motors | $20,692 | $12,162 | n/a |
$17,116
316,964
kWh
|
$3,576
-
kW-mo/yr
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 02 | 2.6231: Utilize controls to operate equipment only when needed | $24,940 | $30,000 | n/a |
$24,940
341,644
kWh
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 03 | 2.7142: Utilize higher efficiency lamps and/or ballasts | $34,684 | $23,130 | n/a |
$28,541
528,538
kWh
|
$6,143
-
kW-mo/yr
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 04 | 2.4236: Eliminate leaks in inert gas and compressed air lines/ valves | $4,852 | $550 | n/a |
$4,912
66,467
kWh
|
- | - | - | - | $(-60.0) | - | - | - |
| 05 | 2.7221: Lower temperature during the winter season and vice-versa | $2,029 | $3,500 | n/a | - | - |
$2,029
-
MMBtu
|
- | - | - | - | - | - |
| 06 | 2.7142: Utilize higher efficiency lamps and/or ballasts | $1,444 | $4,753 | n/a |
$1,045
19,347
kWh
|
$399
-
kW-mo/yr
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 07 | 2.1211: Move boiler to more efficient location | $1,449 | - | n/a | - | - |
$1,449
-
MMBtu
|
- | - | - | - | - | - |
| 08 | 2.7121: Utilize daylight whenever possible in lieu of artificial light | $11,069 | $50,413 | n/a |
$7,351
136,143
kWh
|
$4,218
-
kW-mo/yr
|
- | - | - | $(-500.0) | - | - | - |
| 09 | 2.7135: Install occupancy sensors | $3,373 | $828 | n/a |
$3,373
46,213
kWh
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10 | 3.5311: Recover and reuse waste material | $83,104 | $400,000 | n/a | - | - | - | - | - | - | $83,104 | - | - |
| 11 | 3.6193: Install equipment (eg compactor) to reduce disposal costs | $642 | $1,895 | n/a | - | - | - | - | - | $642 | - | - | - |
| 12 | 3.4155: Meter waste water | $5,209 | $1,700 | n/a | - | - | - |
$5,209
-
Tgal
|
- | - | - | - | - |
| 13 | 4.511: Expand operations into unused space | $40,000 | $4,838 | n/a | - | - | - | - | $40,000 | - | - | - | - |
| 14 | 2.7491: Insulate glazing, walls, ceilings, and roofs | $133,295 | $97,500 | n/a | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | $133,295 |
| 15 | 4.632: Change operating conditions | $4,941 | $5,000 | n/a | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | $4,941 | - |
| 16 | 4.448: Install automatic part storage / retreval system | $2,808 | $864 | n/a | - | - | - | - | - | $2,808 | - | - | - |
| 17 | 4.514: Re-arrange equipment layout to reduce handling costs | $10,000 | $752 | n/a | - | - | - | - | - | $10,000 | - | - | - |
| TOTAL RECOMMENDED | $384,531 | $637,885 |
$87,278
1,455,316
kWh
|
$14,336
-
kW-mo/yr
|
$3,478
-
MMBtu
|
$5,209
-
Tgal
|
$40,000 | $12,890 | $83,104 | $4,941 | $133,295 | ||
| TOTAL IMPLEMENTED | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||
| Yearly Savings* | Imp'd Cost* | Electricity Usage Savings | Electricity Demand Savings | Natural Gas Savings | Water Disposal Savings | Personnel Changes Savings | Administrative Changes Savings | Primary Raw Material Savings | Primary Product Savings | Increase in Production Savings | |||
*Savings and costs are best estimates based on the center's site visit, associated engineering analysis, and typical capital and labor costs