ITAC Assessment: UD0743
ITAC logo
ITAC Assessment: UD0743
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
Assessment Year 2006
Principal Product Metal Based Chemicals
NAICS 325180: Other Basic Inorganic Chemical Manufacturing
SIC 2819: Industrial Inorganic Chemicals, Not Elsewhere Classified
Sales Range $100
M
to 500
M
# of Employees 178
Plant Area 270,000
ft2
Annual Production 102,000,000
lb
Production Hrs. Annual 7,200
hrs
Location (State) Ohio

Facility Energy Cost and Usage

Source Yearly Cost Usage
Electricity Usage $1,081,907 19,355,245
kWh
Natural Gas $2,583,383 284,236
MMBtu
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS -
RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* $630,229 *Non-energy impacts included in savings.
IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* $101,501

Recommendations

# Description Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Status Electricity Usage Savings Electricity Demand Savings Natural Gas Savings Water Disposal Savings Personnel Changes Savings
01 2.7131: Add area lighting switches $206,125 $12,880 $1,813
39,420
kWh
$460
-
kW-mo/yr
$203,852
-
MMBtu
- -
02 2.2424: Use heat in flue gases to preheat products or materials $100,000 $10,000 - - $100,000
-
MMBtu
- -
03 2.4146: Use adjustable frequency drive or multiple speed motors on existing system $64,904 $33,000 $37,830
822,386
kWh
- $27,074
-
MMBtu
- -
04 2.2414: Use waste heat from hot flue gases to preheat $49,086 $100,000 - - $49,086
-
MMBtu
- -
05 2.4237: Substitute compressed air cooling with water or air cooling $54,177 $17,700 $43,033
915,600
kWh
$11,144
-
kW-mo/yr
- - -
06 2.1233: Analyze flue gas for proper air/fuel ratio $25,328 - - - $25,328
-
MMBtu
- -
07 2.4236: Eliminate leaks in inert gas and compressed air lines/ valves $24,000 $1,800 $24,000
430,000
kWh
- - - -
08 2.2113: Repair or replace steam traps $18,000 $1,750 - - $17,000
-
MMBtu
$1,000
-
Tgal
-
09 2.2121: Increase amount of condensate returned $17,000 - - - $13,000
-
MMBtu
$4,000
-
Tgal
-
10 2.1241: Reduce excessive boiler blowdown $15,000 - - - $12,000
-
MMBtu
$3,000
-
Tgal
-
11 2.2211: Use optimum temperature $13,681 - - - $13,681
-
MMBtu
- -
12 2.4146: Use adjustable frequency drive or multiple speed motors on existing system $12,125 $12,000 $9,671
210,240
kWh
$2,454
-
kW-mo/yr
- - -
13 2.1231: Establish burner maintenance schedule for boilers $8,946 - - - $8,946
-
MMBtu
- -
14 2.7142: Utilize higher efficiency lamps and/or ballasts $6,158 $15,600 $4,491
98,000
kWh
$1,386
-
kW-mo/yr
- - $281
15 2.5125: Size air handling grills/ duct/s coils to minimize air resistance $4,060 $10,000 $4,060
72,500
kWh
- - - -
16 2.2414: Use waste heat from hot flue gases to preheat $3,181 $12,130 - - $3,181
-
MMBtu
- -
17 2.7134: Use photocell controls $2,428 $1,776 $1,359
29,546
kWh
$1,069
-
kW-mo/yr
- - -
18 2.7134: Use photocell controls $2,147 - $1,206
26,208
kWh
$941
-
kW-mo/yr
- - -
19 2.4231: Reduce the pressure of compressed air to the minimum required $1,710 - $1,352
29,400
kWh
$358
-
kW-mo/yr
- - -
20 2.4221: Install compressor air intakes in coolest locations $1,342 $500 $1,066
22,680
kWh
$276
-
kW-mo/yr
- - -
21 2.4224: Upgrade controls on compressors $831 - $657
14,280
kWh
$174
-
kW-mo/yr
- - -
TOTAL RECOMMENDED $630,229 $229,136 $130,538
2,710,260
kWh
$18,262
-
kW-mo/yr
$473,148
-
MMBtu
$8,000
-
Tgal
$281
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED $101,501 $4,050 $25,723
466,960
kWh
$450
-
kW-mo/yr
$67,328
-
MMBtu
$8,000
-
Tgal
-
Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Electricity Usage Savings Electricity Demand Savings Natural Gas Savings Water Disposal Savings Personnel Changes Savings
*Savings and costs are best estimates based on the center's site visit, associated engineering analysis, and typical capital and labor costs