| Assessment Year | 2004 |
|---|---|
| Principal Product | metal stamping |
| NAICS | 332119: Metal Crown, Closure, and Other Metal Stamping (except Automotive) |
| SIC | 3469: Metal Stampings, Not Elsewhere Classified |
| Sales Range | $10 M to 50M |
| # of Employees | 200 |
| Plant Area |
160,000
ft2
|
| Annual Production | 1,600,000
pieces
|
| Production Hrs. Annual | 4,080
hrs
|
| Location (State) | Ohio |
Facility Energy Cost and Usage
| Source | Yearly Cost | Usage | Unit Cost | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Electricity Usage | $82,067 | 2,534,911 |
kWh
|
$0.032 |
| Electricity Demand | $89,535 | 6,960 |
kW-mo/yr
|
$12.86 |
| Natural Gas | $114,193 | 12,266 |
MMBtu
|
$9.31 |
| TOTAL YEARLY COSTS | - | |||
| RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* | $131,111 |
See individual recommendations below
*Non-energy impacts included in savings.
|
||
| IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* | $54,454 | |||
Recommendations
| # | Description | Yearly Savings* | Imp'd Cost* | Status | Electricity Usage Savings | Electricity Demand Savings | Electricity Fees Savings | Natural Gas Savings | Solid Waste (haz) Savings | Personnel Changes Savings | Administrative Changes Savings |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01 | 4.621: Use fixtures to reduce machine changeout times | $28,020 | $48,560 |
$741
23,902
kWh
|
- | - | - | - | $27,279 | - | |
| 02 | 2.4312: Improve lubrication practices | $20,849 | $16,000 |
$11,616
876
kWh
|
$9,233
-
kW-mo/yr
|
- | - | - | - | - | |
| 03 | 4.111: Add equipment/ operators to reduce production bottleneck | $20,424 | - |
$678
21,870
kWh
|
- | - |
$5,075
-
MMBtu
|
- | $14,671 | - | |
| 04 | 2.2414: Use waste heat from hot flue gases to preheat | $16,486 | $23,704 | - | - | - |
$16,486
-
MMBtu
|
- | - | - | |
| 05 | 2.7142: Utilize higher efficiency lamps and/or ballasts | $9,050 | $27,720 |
$4,000
128,930
kWh
|
$4,930
-
kW-mo/yr
|
- | - |
$380
-
lb
|
$(-260.0) | - | |
| 06 | 2.8113: Purchase gas directly from a contract gas supplier | $14,597 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | $14,597 | |
| 07 | 2.8112: Combine utility meters | $3,895 | $10,200 | - | - | $3,895 | - | - | - | - | |
| 08 | 2.4231: Reduce the pressure of compressed air to the minimum required | $3,140 | - |
$1,390
44,880
kWh
|
$1,750
-
kW-mo/yr
|
- | - | - | - | - | |
| 09 | 2.2437: Recover waste heat from equipment | $3,082 | $2,000 | - | - | - |
$3,082
-
MMBtu
|
- | - | - | |
| 10 | 2.6218: Turn off equipment when not in use | $2,425 | $2,540 |
$2,425
78,270
kWh
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | |
| 11 | 2.4224: Upgrade controls on compressors | $2,285 | - |
$1,010
32,640
kWh
|
$1,275
-
kW-mo/yr
|
- | - | - | - | - | |
| 12 | 2.4236: Eliminate leaks in inert gas and compressed air lines/ valves | $1,715 | $640 |
$760
24,480
kWh
|
$955
-
kW-mo/yr
|
- | - | - | - | - | |
| 13 | 2.4231: Reduce the pressure of compressed air to the minimum required | $1,680 | - |
$820
26,440
kWh
|
$860
-
kW-mo/yr
|
- | - | - | - | - | |
| 14 | 2.7134: Use photocell controls | $1,210 | $2,040 |
$1,210
17,850
kWh
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | |
| 15 | 2.7142: Utilize higher efficiency lamps and/or ballasts | $1,012 | $1,566 |
$455
14,689
kWh
|
$557
-
kW-mo/yr
|
- | - | - | - | - | |
| 16 | 2.7231: Use radiant heater for spot heating | $911 | $1,436 | - | - | - |
$911
-
MMBtu
|
- | - | - | |
| 17 | 2.4236: Eliminate leaks in inert gas and compressed air lines/ valves | $175 | $58 |
$50
1,630
kWh
|
$125
-
kW-mo/yr
|
- | - | - | - | - | |
| 18 | 2.4231: Reduce the pressure of compressed air to the minimum required | $155 | - |
$45
1,430
kWh
|
$110
-
kW-mo/yr
|
- | - | - | - | - | |
| TOTAL RECOMMENDED | $131,111 | $136,464 |
$25,200
417,887
kWh
|
$19,795
-
kW-mo/yr
|
$3,895 |
$25,554
-
MMBtu
|
$380
-
lb
|
$41,690 | $14,597 | ||
| TOTAL IMPLEMENTED | $54,454 | $49,258 |
$4,104
132,392
kWh
|
$3,325
-
kW-mo/yr
|
- |
$5,075
-
MMBtu
|
- | $41,950 | - | ||
| Yearly Savings* | Imp'd Cost* | Electricity Usage Savings | Electricity Demand Savings | Electricity Fees Savings | Natural Gas Savings | Solid Waste (haz) Savings | Personnel Changes Savings | Administrative Changes Savings | |||
*Savings and costs are best estimates based on the center's site visit, associated engineering analysis, and typical capital and labor costs