ITAC Assessment: UD0557
ITAC logo
ITAC Assessment: UD0557
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
Assessment Year 1998
Principal Product Metal coatings(chemical, heat resistant, metallic, coil)
NAICS
n/a
SIC 3479: Coating, Engraving, and Allied Services, Not Elsewhere Classified
Sales Range $10
M
to 50
M
# of Employees 90
Plant Area 55,000
ft2
Annual Production 2,000
Tgal
Production Hrs. Annual 7,344
hrs
Location (State) Ohio

Facility Energy Cost and Usage

Source Yearly Cost Usage
Electricity Usage $103,657 2,024,033
kWh
Electricity Demand $23,429 6,384
kW-mo/yr
Natural Gas $24,153 6,717
MMBtu
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS -
RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* $126,280 *Non-energy impacts included in savings.
IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* $103,145

Recommendations

# Description Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Status Electricity Usage Savings Electricity Demand Savings Electricity Fees Savings Natural Gas Savings Other Liquid (haz) Savings Personnel Changes Savings One-time Revenue or Avoided Cost Savings
01 4.652: Replace existing equipment with more suitable substitutes $42,942 $12,000 - - - - $12,342
-
gal
$30,600 -
02 2.8114: Change rate schedules or other changes in utility service $60,203 - - - $20,641 - - - $39,562
03 3.8143: Recycle cleaning solvent and reuse $9,078 - - - - - $10,098
-
gal
$(-1,020.0) -
04 2.6231: Utilize controls to operate equipment only when needed $7,643 $1,440 $7,643
183,763
kWh
- - - - - -
05 2.4322: Use or replace with energy efficient substitutes $4,636 $6,680 $2,384
57,444
kWh
$110
-
kW-mo/yr
- $2,142
-
MMBtu
- - -
06 2.3132: Recharge batteries on during off-peak demand periods $1,778 - - $1,778
-
kW-mo/yr
- - - - -
TOTAL RECOMMENDED $126,280 $20,120 $10,027
241,207
kWh
$1,888
-
kW-mo/yr
$20,641 $2,142
-
MMBtu
$22,440
-
gal
$29,580 $39,562
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED $103,145 $12,000 - - $20,641 - $12,342
-
gal
$30,600 $39,562
Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Electricity Usage Savings Electricity Demand Savings Electricity Fees Savings Natural Gas Savings Other Liquid (haz) Savings Personnel Changes Savings One-time Revenue or Avoided Cost Savings
*Savings and costs are best estimates based on the center's site visit, associated engineering analysis, and typical capital and labor costs