ITAC Assessment: UD0509
ITAC logo
ITAC Assessment: UD0509
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
Assessment Year 1996
Principal Product Silicon Powder
NAICS
n/a
SIC 2899: Chemicals and Chemical Preparations, Not Elsewhere Classified
Sales Range $10
M
to 50
M
# of Employees 80
Plant Area 100,000
ft2
Annual Production 0
units
Production Hrs. Annual 8,600
hrs
Location (State) Ohio

Facility Energy Cost and Usage

Source Yearly Cost Usage
Electricity Usage $342,734 16,325,323
kWh
Electricity Demand $410,450 29,172
kW-mo/yr
Natural Gas $649,094 184,187
MMBtu
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS -
RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* $258,433 *Non-energy impacts included in savings.
IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* $19,723

Recommendations

# Description Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Status Electricity Usage Savings Electricity Demand Savings Water Disposal Savings Other Liquid (haz) Savings Solid Waste (haz) Savings Personnel Changes Savings
01 2.4322: Use or replace with energy efficient substitutes $71,145 $170,000 $31,805
1,514,654
kWh
$39,340
-
kW-mo/yr
- - - -
02 2.4231: Reduce the pressure of compressed air to the minimum required $10,840 - $4,846
230,657
kWh
$5,994
-
kW-mo/yr
- - - -
03 2.4221: Install compressor air intakes in coolest locations $5,600 $5,000 $5,600
99,648
kWh
- - - - -
04 3.4113: Treat and reuse rinse waters $160,244 $100,000 - - $160,244
-
Tgal
- - -
05 3.6192: Use a less expensive method of waste removal $1,320 - - - - $1,320
-
gal
- -
06 3.6192: Use a less expensive method of waste removal $4,442 - - - - - $4,442
-
lb
-
07 2.7134: Use photocell controls $1,279 $621 $333
15,826
kWh
$724
-
kW-mo/yr
- - - $222
08 2.7142: Utilize higher efficiency lamps and/or ballasts $1,559 $3,600 $647
30,774
kWh
$604
-
kW-mo/yr
- - - $308
09 2.7142: Utilize higher efficiency lamps and/or ballasts $512 $1,600 $230
10,844
kWh
$215
-
kW-mo/yr
- - - $67
10 2.7142: Utilize higher efficiency lamps and/or ballasts $1,492 $3,080 $771
36,635
kWh
$721
-
kW-mo/yr
- - - -
TOTAL RECOMMENDED $258,433 $283,901 $44,232
1,939,038
kWh
$47,598
-
kW-mo/yr
$160,244
-
Tgal
$1,320
-
gal
$4,442
-
lb
$597
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED $19,723 $10,301 $11,780
393,610
kWh
$7,654
-
kW-mo/yr
- - - $289
Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Electricity Usage Savings Electricity Demand Savings Water Disposal Savings Other Liquid (haz) Savings Solid Waste (haz) Savings Personnel Changes Savings
*Savings and costs are best estimates based on the center's site visit, associated engineering analysis, and typical capital and labor costs