ITAC Assessment: UD0193
ITAC logo
ITAC Assessment: UD0193
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
Assessment Year 1986
Principal Product RR TRACKWORK PRODUCTS
NAICS
n/a
SIC 3743: Railroad Equipment
Sales Range $10
M
to 50
M
# of Employees 67
Plant Area
n/a
Annual Production 0
units
Production Hrs. Annual 5,200
hrs
Location (State) Ohio

Facility Energy Cost and Usage

Source Yearly Cost Usage
Electricity Usage $135,738 2,017,878
kWh
Natural Gas $77,417 15,115
MMBtu
Fuel Oil #2 $39,169 7,000
MMBtu
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS -
RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* $78,430 *Non-energy impacts included in savings.
IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* $13,891

Recommendations

# Description Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Status Electricity Usage Savings Natural Gas Savings Fuel Oil #2 Savings Administrative Changes Savings
01 2.4322: Use or replace with energy efficient substitutes $52,010 $16,000 $12,841
234,174
kWh
- $39,169
-
MMBtu
-
02 2.7494: Install storm windows and doors $12,529 $16,200 - $12,529
-
MMBtu
- -
03 2.6232: Install set-back timers $1,589 - $1,558
45,721
kWh
$(-169.0)
-
MMBtu
- $200
04 2.3131: Reschedule plant operations or reduce load to avoid peaks $3,168 - $3,348
-
kWh
- - $(-180.0)
05 2.4322: Use or replace with energy efficient substitutes $9,134 $21,000 - $8,284
-
MMBtu
- $850
TOTAL RECOMMENDED $78,430 $53,200 $17,747
279,895
kWh
$20,644
-
MMBtu
$39,169
-
MMBtu
$870
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED $13,891 $21,000 $4,906
45,721
kWh
$8,115
-
MMBtu
- $870
*Savings and costs are best estimates based on the center's site visit, associated engineering analysis, and typical capital and labor costs