ITAC logo
ITAC Assessment: SF0625
ITAC logo
ITAC Assessment: SF0625
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
See Complete Announcement
Grant Program - Open Solicitation
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
Find Something New - Open Random Assessment MAIN ITAC SITE VERSION [FOR BETA TESTING ONLY]
San Francisco State University San Francisco State University
Assessment Year 2024
Principal Product Chocolate and panned candy
NAICS 311352: Confectionery Manufacturing from Purchased Chocolate
SIC 2067: Chewing Gum
Sales Range $100
M
to 500
M
# of Employees 218
Plant Area 300,000
ft2
Annual Production 26,000,000
lb
Production Hrs. Annual 6,600
hrs
Location (State) California

Facility Energy Cost and Usage

Source Yearly Cost Usage
Electricity Usage $826,335 10,744,271
kWh
Electricity Demand $383,356 19,998
kW-mo/yr
Natural Gas $568,492 44,240
MMBtu
Waste Disposal Costs
Water Disposal $132,453 17,932
Tgal
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS $1,910,636
RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* $424,228 *Non-energy impacts included in savings.
IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* -

Recommendations

# Description Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Status Electricity Usage Savings Electricity Demand Savings Natural Gas Savings Water Disposal Savings Personnel Changes Savings Primary Raw Material Savings
01 2.4236: Eliminate leaks in inert gas and compressed air lines/ valves $2,669 - $3,869
50,296
kWh
- - - $(-1,200.0) -
02 2.7224: Reduce space conditioning during non-working hours $8,680 $588 $2,692
35,002
kWh
- $5,988
-
MMBtu
- - -
03 2.2135: Repair and eliminate steam leaks $8,671 $516 - - $5,741
-
MMBtu
$2,930
-
Tgal
- -
04 2.6231: Utilize controls to operate equipment only when needed $5,071 $854 $5,071
65,941
kWh
- - - - -
05 2.2121: Increase amount of condensate returned $26,010 $8,735 - - $17,219
-
MMBtu
$8,791
-
Tgal
- -
06 2.7142: Utilize higher efficiency lamps and/or ballasts $12,576 $3,859 $6,251
81,294
kWh
$2,325
-
kW-mo/yr
- - $4,047 $(-47.0)
07 2.4146: Use adjustable frequency drive or multiple speed motors on existing system $11,943 $10,277 $11,943
155,311
kWh
- - - - -
08 2.2628: Utilize a less expensive cooling method $155,547 $160,389 $149,934
1,949,730
kWh
$5,613
-
kW-mo/yr
- - - -
09 2.6231: Utilize controls to operate equipment only when needed $14,307 $15,295 $14,307
186,053
kWh
- - - - -
10 2.4146: Use adjustable frequency drive or multiple speed motors on existing system $1,369 $7,928 $1,369
17,802
kWh
- - - - -
11 2.9114: Use solar heat to make electricty $177,385 $2,104,448 $177,385
2,306,694
kWh
- - - - -
TOTAL RECOMMENDED $424,228 $2,312,889 $372,821
4,848,123
kWh
$7,938
-
kW-mo/yr
$28,948
-
MMBtu
$11,721
-
Tgal
$2,847 $(-47.0)
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED - - - - - - - -
Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Electricity Usage Savings Electricity Demand Savings Natural Gas Savings Water Disposal Savings Personnel Changes Savings Primary Raw Material Savings
*Savings and costs are best estimates based on the center's site visit, associated engineering analysis, and typical capital and labor costs