ITAC Assessment: SF0175
ITAC logo
ITAC Assessment: SF0175
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
Assessment Year 1999
Principal Product Tempered Glass
NAICS
n/a
SIC 3231: Glass Products, Made of Purchased Glass
Sales Range $10
M
to 50
M
# of Employees 106
Plant Area 80,000
ft2
Annual Production 3,000
thousand feet
Production Hrs. Annual 7,752
hrs
Location (State) California

Facility Energy Cost and Usage

Source Yearly Cost Usage
Electricity Usage $286,088 4,916,764
kWh
Electricity Demand $144,577 11,380
kW-mo/yr
Natural Gas $1,421 210
MMBtu
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS -
RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* $1,906,479 *Non-energy impacts included in savings.
IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* $1,539,027

Recommendations

# Description Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Status Electricity Usage Savings Electricity Demand Savings Natural Gas Savings Solid Waste (non-haz) Savings Administrative Changes Savings Primary Product Savings
01 2.7142: Utilize higher efficiency lamps and/or ballasts $7,293 $3,150 $5,451
93,787
kWh
$1,842
-
kW-mo/yr
- - - -
02 2.1311: Replace electrically-operated equipment with fossil fuel equipment $6,834 $3,195 $8,120
139,508
kWh
$2,743
-
kW-mo/yr
$(-4,029.0)
-
MMBtu
- - -
03 2.6231: Utilize controls to operate equipment only when needed $769 $466 $575
9,965
kWh
$194
-
kW-mo/yr
- - - -
04 2.4111: Utilize energy-efficient belts and other improved mechanisms $2,740 $1,817 $2,048
35,170
kWh
$692
-
kW-mo/yr
- - - -
05 2.4146: Use adjustable frequency drive or multiple speed motors on existing system $88,190 $133,150 $65,919
1,132,767
kWh
$22,271
-
kW-mo/yr
- - - -
06 2.7142: Utilize higher efficiency lamps and/or ballasts $8,802 $14,510 $6,514
111,958
kWh
$2,288
-
kW-mo/yr
- - - -
07 3.5313: Increase amount of waste recovered for resale $1,413 - - - - $1,413
-
lb
- -
08 4.126: Install sensors to detect defects $821,093 $48,500 - - - - $821,093 -
09 4.111: Add equipment/ operators to reduce production bottleneck $131,976 $10,000 - - - - $131,976 -
10 4.424: Improve space comfort conditioning $574,512 $43,227 - - - - $55,812 $518,700
11 2.8114: Change rate schedules or other changes in utility service $54,584 $130,000 - - - - $54,584 -
12 2.3192: Use fossil fuel powered generator during peak demand periods $110,720 $322,185 $202,990
3,488,570
kWh
$68,580
-
kW-mo/yr
$(-160,850.0)
-
MMBtu
- - -
13 2.1311: Replace electrically-operated equipment with fossil fuel equipment $97,553 $950,000 $90,218
1,550,410
kWh
$30,480
-
kW-mo/yr
$(-23,145.0)
-
MMBtu
- - -
TOTAL RECOMMENDED $1,906,479 $1,660,200 $381,835
6,562,135
kWh
$129,090
-
kW-mo/yr
$(-188,024.0)
-
MMBtu
$1,413
-
lb
$1,063,465 $518,700
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED $1,539,027 $106,694 $7,499
128,957
kWh
$2,534
-
kW-mo/yr
- $1,413
-
lb
$1,008,881 $518,700
Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Electricity Usage Savings Electricity Demand Savings Natural Gas Savings Solid Waste (non-haz) Savings Administrative Changes Savings Primary Product Savings
*Savings and costs are best estimates based on the center's site visit, associated engineering analysis, and typical capital and labor costs