| Assessment Year | 2015 |
|---|---|
| Principal Product | Stud Lumber |
| NAICS | 321912: Cut Stock, Resawing Lumber, and Planing |
| SIC | 2421: Sawmills and Planing Mills, General |
| Sales Range | $10 M to 50M |
| # of Employees | 191 |
| Plant Area |
2,744,280
ft2
|
| Annual Production | 152,400,000
units
|
| Production Hrs. Annual | 5,250
hrs
|
| Location (State) | Oregon |
Facility Energy Cost and Usage
| Source | Yearly Cost | Usage | Unit Cost | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Electricity Usage | $1,758,138 | 31,061,180 |
kWh
|
$0.057 |
| Electricity Demand | $232,961 | 72,540 |
kW-mo/yr
|
$3.21 |
| Electricity Fees | $131,530 | - |
|
- |
| Other Energy | $414,656 | 502,146 |
MMBtu
|
$0.83 |
| TOTAL YEARLY COSTS | - | |||
| RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* | $124,049 |
See individual recommendations below
*Non-energy impacts included in savings.
|
||
| IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* | $24,478 | |||
Recommendations
| # | Description | Yearly Savings* | Imp'd Cost* | Status | Electricity Usage Savings | Electricity Demand Savings | Wood Savings | Personnel Changes Savings | Ancillary Material Cost Savings |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01 | 2.4146: Use adjustable frequency drive or multiple speed motors on existing system | $21,044 | $11,800 |
$21,044
357,708
kWh
|
- | - | - | - | |
| 02 | 2.2127: Flash condensate to produce lower pressure steam | $88,324 | $19,650 | - | - |
$88,324
-
MMBtu
|
- | - | |
| 03 | 2.6231: Utilize controls to operate equipment only when needed | $3,107 | $1,025 |
$3,107
52,813
kWh
|
- | - | - | - | |
| 04 | 2.7142: Utilize higher efficiency lamps and/or ballasts | $8,140 | $7,325 |
$6,165
104,788
kWh
|
$623
-
kW-mo/yr
|
- | $216 | $1,136 | |
| 05 | 2.4111: Utilize energy-efficient belts and other improved mechanisms | $3,434 | - |
$3,043
51,726
kWh
|
$391
-
kW-mo/yr
|
- | - | - | |
| TOTAL RECOMMENDED | $124,049 | $39,800 |
$33,359
567,035
kWh
|
$1,014
-
kW-mo/yr
|
$88,324
-
MMBtu
|
$216 | $1,136 | ||
| TOTAL IMPLEMENTED | $24,478 | $11,800 |
$24,087
409,434
kWh
|
$391
-
kW-mo/yr
|
- | - | - | ||
*Savings and costs are best estimates based on the center's site visit, associated engineering analysis, and typical capital and labor costs