ITAC logo
ITAC Assessment: OR0496
ITAC logo
ITAC Assessment: OR0496
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
See Complete Announcement
Grant Program - Open Solicitation
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
Find Something New - Open Random Assessment MAIN ITAC SITE VERSION [FOR BETA TESTING ONLY]
Oregon State University Oregon State University
Assessment Year 2005
Principal Product Plywood
NAICS 321212: Softwood Veneer and Plywood Manufacturing
SIC 2436: Softwood Veneer and Plywood
Sales Range $50
M
to 100
M
# of Employees 175
Plant Area 115,000
ft2
Annual Production 207,000
thousand feet
Production Hrs. Annual 7,800
hrs
Location (State) Washington

Facility Energy Cost and Usage

Source Yearly Cost Usage
Electricity Usage $1,820,384 47,616,626
kWh
Electricity Fees $261,099 -
Natural Gas $47,569 5,766
MMBtu
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS -
RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* $1,337,250 *Non-energy impacts included in savings.
IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* $586,200

Recommendations

# Description Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Status Electricity Usage Savings Electricity Demand Savings Electricity Fees Savings Wood Savings Personnel Changes Savings One-time Revenue or Avoided Cost Savings Increase in Production Savings
01 2.4321: Upgrade obsolete equipment $689,000 $213,000 - - - - - - $689,000
02 4.652: Replace existing equipment with more suitable substitutes $282,000 $212,000 - - - - - $(-20,000.0) $302,000
03 2.4146: Use adjustable frequency drive or multiple speed motors on existing system $201,300 $301,500 $185,900
4,866,000
kWh
$15,400
-
kW-mo/yr
- - - - -
04 2.1213: Direct warmest air to combustion intake $66,800 $118,000 $24,000
706,600
kWh
$1,800
-
kW-mo/yr
- $41,000
-
MMBtu
- - -
05 2.3212: Optimize plant power factor $51,400 $28,000 - - $51,400 - - - -
06 2.4133: Use most efficient type of electric motors $33,700 $91,000 $31,000
820,000
kWh
$2,700
-
kW-mo/yr
- - - - -
07 2.4224: Upgrade controls on compressors $8,030 $2,000 $8,030
2,011,000
kWh
- - - - - -
08 2.7134: Use photocell controls $2,400 $900 $1,600
42,500
kWh
$200
-
kW-mo/yr
- - $600 - -
09 2.4323: Use optimum size and capacity equipment $1,425 - $1,300
33,950
kWh
$125
-
kW-mo/yr
- - - - -
10 2.4322: Use or replace with energy efficient substitutes $780 $295 $780
20,500
kWh
- - - - - -
11 2.4224: Upgrade controls on compressors $415 $600 $390
11,000
kWh
$25
-
kW-mo/yr
- - - - -
TOTAL RECOMMENDED $1,337,250 $967,295 $253,000
8,511,550
kWh
$20,250
-
kW-mo/yr
$51,400 $41,000
-
MMBtu
$600 $(-20,000.0) $991,000
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED $586,200 $723,400 $242,500
6,435,100
kWh
$20,100
-
kW-mo/yr
- $41,000
-
MMBtu
$600 $(-20,000.0) $302,000
Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Electricity Usage Savings Electricity Demand Savings Electricity Fees Savings Wood Savings Personnel Changes Savings One-time Revenue or Avoided Cost Savings Increase in Production Savings
*Savings and costs are best estimates based on the center's site visit, associated engineering analysis, and typical capital and labor costs