ITAC Assessment: OR0294
ITAC logo
ITAC Assessment: OR0294
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
Assessment Year 1997
Principal Product Asphalt Roofing Sheet
NAICS
n/a
SIC 2952: Asphalt Felts and Coatings
Sales Range $10
M
to 50
M
# of Employees 25
Plant Area 35,000
ft2
Annual Production 604,332
pieces
Production Hrs. Annual 4,320
hrs
Location (State) Oregon

Facility Energy Cost and Usage

Source Yearly Cost Usage
Electricity Usage $26,753 802,755
kWh
Electricity Demand $10,018 2,772
kW-mo/yr
Electricity Fees $1,942 -
Natural Gas $64,019 18,087
MMBtu
LPG $5,970 459
MMBtu
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS -
RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* $157,454 *Non-energy impacts included in savings.
IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* $6,323

Recommendations

# Description Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Status Electricity Usage Savings Electricity Demand Savings Electricity Fees Savings Natural Gas Savings LPG Savings Solid Waste (non-haz) Savings Solid Waste (haz) Savings Personnel Changes Savings Administrative Changes Savings Primary Raw Material Savings Ancillary Material Cost Savings
01 2.7121: Utilize daylight whenever possible in lieu of artificial light $1,710 $500 $1,290
38,980
kWh
- - - - - - $70 - - $350
02 2.1233: Analyze flue gas for proper air/fuel ratio $1,320 $500 - - - $1,320
-
MMBtu
- - - - - - -
03 2.4236: Eliminate leaks in inert gas and compressed air lines/ valves $1,520 $1,000 $1,520
45,721
kWh
- - - - - - - - - -
04 2.4224: Upgrade controls on compressors $1,540 $3,700 $1,540
46,307
kWh
- - - - - - - - - -
05 2.3212: Optimize plant power factor $861 $2,600 - - $861 - - - - - - - -
06 2.4133: Use most efficient type of electric motors $1,133 $3,516 $804
24,326
kWh
$329
-
kW-mo/yr
- - - - - - - - -
07 2.1221: Replace obsolete burners with more efficient ones $8,920 $80,000 - - - $8,920
-
MMBtu
- - - - - - -
08 4.211: Consider use / purchase of bulk materials where possible $9,140 $80,000 $(-410.0)
(-12,309)
kWh
$(-250.0)
-
kW-mo/yr
- - $100
-
MMBtu
- - $9,700 - - -
09 3.1175: Use a different or recycled raw material $117,450 $206,000 $(-4,000.0)
(-120,164)
kWh
- - - - $(-38,300.0)
-
lb
- - $(-10,250.0) $170,000 -
10 4.513: Re-arrange equipment layout to reduce labor costs $11,700 $22,500 - - - - $200
-
MMBtu
- - $11,500 - - -
11 3.1191: Change procedures / equipment / operating conditions $2,160 - - - - - - - $2,200
-
lb
- - - $(-40.0)
TOTAL RECOMMENDED $157,454 $400,316 $744
22,861
kWh
$79
-
kW-mo/yr
$861 $10,240
-
MMBtu
$300
-
MMBtu
$(-38,300.0)
-
lb
$2,200
-
lb
$21,270 $(-10,250.0) $170,000 $310
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED $6,323 $4,516 $2,094
63,306
kWh
$329
-
kW-mo/yr
- $1,320
-
MMBtu
- - $2,200
-
lb
$70 - - $310
Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Electricity Usage Savings Electricity Demand Savings Electricity Fees Savings Natural Gas Savings LPG Savings Solid Waste (non-haz) Savings Solid Waste (haz) Savings Personnel Changes Savings Administrative Changes Savings Primary Raw Material Savings Ancillary Material Cost Savings
*Savings and costs are best estimates based on the center's site visit, associated engineering analysis, and typical capital and labor costs