ITAC Assessment: NC0420
ITAC logo
ITAC Assessment: NC0420
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
Assessment Year 2011
Principal Product Bone china
NAICS 327110: Pottery, Ceramics, and Plumbing Fixture Manufacturing
SIC 3262: Vitreous China Table and Kitchen Articles
Sales Range $50
M
to 100
M
# of Employees 300
Plant Area 150,000
ft2
Annual Production 6,125,000
pieces
Production Hrs. Annual 6,000
hrs
Location (State) North Carolina

Facility Energy Cost and Usage

Source Yearly Cost Usage
Electricity Usage $911,592 13,009,646
kWh
Electricity Demand $484,426 28,721
kW-mo/yr
Electricity Fees $10,374 -
Natural Gas $597,187 94,986
MMBtu
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS -
RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* $549,097 *Non-energy impacts included in savings.
IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* $103,467

Recommendations

# Description Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Status Electricity Usage Savings Electricity Demand Savings Natural Gas Savings Personnel Changes Savings Primary Raw Material Savings Ancillary Material Cost Savings
01 2.7142: Utilize higher efficiency lamps and/or ballasts $19,026 $62,095 $11,800
167,857
kWh
$6,046
-
kW-mo/yr
- - - $1,180
02 2.7142: Utilize higher efficiency lamps and/or ballasts $43,618 $130,787 $37,471
533,022
kWh
$17,674
-
kW-mo/yr
- - - $(-11,527.0)
03 2.3415: Use a fossil fuel engine to cogenerate electricity or motive power; and utilize heat $67,800 $304,000 $151,848
2,160,000
kWh
- $(-75,048.0)
-
MMBtu
- - $(-9,000.0)
04 2.4236: Eliminate leaks in inert gas and compressed air lines/ valves $1,604 $100 $1,652
23,499
kWh
$792
-
kW-mo/yr
- $(-600.0) - $(-240.0)
05 2.4231: Reduce the pressure of compressed air to the minimum required $23,785 - $17,700
251,772
kWh
$6,085
-
kW-mo/yr
- - - -
06 2.4226: Use / purchase optimum sized compressor $15,434 $55,000 $10,432
148,399
kWh
$3,502
-
kW-mo/yr
- - - $1,500
07 3.1194: Use automatic flow control $377,830 $3,425 - - - - $377,830 -
TOTAL RECOMMENDED $549,097 $555,407 $230,903
3,284,549
kWh
$34,099
-
kW-mo/yr
$(-75,048.0)
-
MMBtu
$(-600.0) $377,830 $(-18,087.0)
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED $103,467 $247,982 $79,055
1,124,549
kWh
$34,099
-
kW-mo/yr
- $(-600.0) - $(-9,087.0)
Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Electricity Usage Savings Electricity Demand Savings Natural Gas Savings Personnel Changes Savings Primary Raw Material Savings Ancillary Material Cost Savings
*Savings and costs are best estimates based on the center's site visit, associated engineering analysis, and typical capital and labor costs