ITAC Assessment: NC0227
ITAC logo
ITAC Assessment: NC0227
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
Assessment Year 2001
Principal Product Casegood furniture
NAICS
n/a
SIC 2511: Wood Household Furniture, Except Upholstered
Sales Range $10
M
to 50
M
# of Employees 563
Plant Area 750,000
ft2
Annual Production 320,000
pieces
Production Hrs. Annual 2,500
hrs
Location (State) North Carolina

Facility Energy Cost and Usage

Source Yearly Cost Usage
Electricity Usage $631,080 14,883,952
kWh
Electricity Demand $198,212 55,059
kW-mo/yr
Electricity Fees $4,118 -
Fuel Oil #6 $344,191 67,722
MMBtu
Coal $58,898 37,260
MMBtu
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS -
RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* $685,205 *Non-energy impacts included in savings.
IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* $299,069

Recommendations

# Description Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Status Electricity Usage Savings Electricity Demand Savings Natural Gas Savings Fuel Oil #6 Savings Other Liquid (haz) Savings Personnel Changes Savings Administrative Changes Savings Primary Raw Material Savings Ancillary Material Cost Savings One-time Revenue or Avoided Cost Savings
01 2.7124: Make a practice of turning off lights when not needed $1,391 $250 $1,391
32,800
kWh
- - - - - - - - -
02 2.6218: Turn off equipment when not in use $15,815 $30,000 $15,815
373,000
kWh
- - - - - - - - -
03 2.2136: Install / repair insulation on steam lines $662 $308 - - $662
-
MMBtu
- - - - - - -
04 2.1116: Improve combustion control capability $89,586 $60,000 - - - $89,586
-
MMBtu
- - - - - -
05 2.1223: Install smaller boiler (increase high fire duty cycle) $30,612 $50,000 - - $14,105
-
MMBtu
$17,861
-
MMBtu
- - $(-1,354.0) - - -
06 2.2124: Install de-aerator in place of condensate tank $200,000 $35,000 - - - - - - - - - $200,000
07 2.1111: Control pressure on steamer operations $7,356 $7,500 - - - $7,356
-
MMBtu
- - - - - -
08 2.1311: Replace electrically-operated equipment with fossil fuel equipment $4,500 $5,000 $5,088
120,000
kWh
$2,012
-
kW-mo/yr
- $(-2,600.0)
-
MMBtu
- - - - - -
09 2.1133: Adjust burners for efficient operation $17,577 $15,000 - - $17,577
-
MMBtu
- - - - - - -
10 2.4151: Develop a repair/replace policy $2,636 $4,205 $1,867
44,044
kWh
$769
-
kW-mo/yr
- - - - - - - -
11 2.4111: Utilize energy-efficient belts and other improved mechanisms $2,277 $2,690 $1,617
38,146
kWh
$660
-
kW-mo/yr
- - - - - - - -
12 2.4236: Eliminate leaks in inert gas and compressed air lines/ valves $824 $1,210 $582
13,725
kWh
$242
-
kW-mo/yr
- - - - - - - -
13 3.7198: Reduce / eliminate use of disposable product $8,933 $10,067 - - - - $200
-
gal
$(-1,667.0) - - $10,400 -
14 4.512: Condense operation into one building $279,320 $500,000 $48,777
670,210
kWh
- $36,543
-
MMBtu
- - $240,000 $(-46,000.0) - - -
15 4.131: Modify process to reduce material use/cost $23,716 $15,000 - - - - - - - $23,716 - -
TOTAL RECOMMENDED $685,205 $736,230 $75,137
1,291,925
kWh
$3,683
-
kW-mo/yr
$68,887
-
MMBtu
$112,203
-
MMBtu
$200
-
gal
$238,333 $(-47,354.0) $23,716 $10,400 $200,000
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED $299,069 $522,982 $51,226
727,979
kWh
$1,011
-
kW-mo/yr
$36,543
-
MMBtu
$7,356
-
MMBtu
$200
-
gal
$238,333 $(-46,000.0) - $10,400 -
Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Electricity Usage Savings Electricity Demand Savings Natural Gas Savings Fuel Oil #6 Savings Other Liquid (haz) Savings Personnel Changes Savings Administrative Changes Savings Primary Raw Material Savings Ancillary Material Cost Savings One-time Revenue or Avoided Cost Savings
*Savings and costs are best estimates based on the center's site visit, associated engineering analysis, and typical capital and labor costs