ITAC Assessment: NC0106
ITAC logo
ITAC Assessment: NC0106
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
Assessment Year 1997
Principal Product paper for liquid packaging
NAICS
n/a
SIC 2657: Folding Paperboard Boxes, Including Sanitary
Sales Range $50
M
to 100
M
# of Employees 255
Plant Area 165,000
ft2
Annual Production 50,000
ton
Production Hrs. Annual 8,760
hrs
Location (State) North Carolina

Facility Energy Cost and Usage

Source Yearly Cost Usage
Electricity Usage $600,559 18,680,246
kWh
Electricity Demand $336,046 35,655
kW-mo/yr
Electricity Fees $45,041 -
Natural Gas $161,160 49,897
MMBtu
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS -
RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* $2,842,608 *Non-energy impacts included in savings.
IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* $2,648,432

Recommendations

# Description Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Status Electricity Usage Savings Electricity Demand Savings Electricity Fees Savings Natural Gas Savings Solid Waste (non-haz) Savings Administrative Changes Savings Increase in Production Savings
01 4.111: Add equipment/ operators to reduce production bottleneck $2,580,000 $750,000 - - - - - - $2,580,000
02 2.4133: Use most efficient type of electric motors $1,860 $1,488 $1,330
41,032
kWh
$530
-
kW-mo/yr
- - - - -
03 2.4221: Install compressor air intakes in coolest locations $4,304 $770 $3,078
94,666
kWh
$1,226
-
kW-mo/yr
- - - - -
04 2.1233: Analyze flue gas for proper air/fuel ratio $6,634 $1,200 - - - $6,634
-
MMBtu
- - -
05 2.7314: Reduce ventilation air $21,825 $35,000 $1,400
43,083
kWh
$1,940
-
kW-mo/yr
- $18,485
-
MMBtu
- - -
06 2.3132: Recharge batteries on during off-peak demand periods $1,895 - - - $1,895 - - - -
07 2.7134: Use photocell controls $113 $90 $64
2,052
kWh
$49
-
kW-mo/yr
- - - - -
08 2.7142: Utilize higher efficiency lamps and/or ballasts $507 $1,530 $190
5,862
kWh
$317
-
kW-mo/yr
- - - - -
09 2.7142: Utilize higher efficiency lamps and/or ballasts $193 $840 $96
2,931
kWh
$37
-
kW-mo/yr
- - - $60 -
10 3.1192: Reduce scrap production $187,277 - $22,277
685,522
kWh
- - - $165,000
-
lb
- -
11 3.1192: Reduce scrap production $38,000 - - - - - $48,000
-
lb
$(-10,000.0) -
TOTAL RECOMMENDED $2,842,608 $790,918 $28,435
875,148
kWh
$4,099
-
kW-mo/yr
$1,895 $25,119
-
MMBtu
$213,000
-
lb
$(-9,940.0) $2,580,000
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED $2,648,432 $787,778 $2,794
86,167
kWh
$2,519
-
kW-mo/yr
- $25,119
-
MMBtu
$48,000
-
lb
$(-10,000.0) $2,580,000
Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Electricity Usage Savings Electricity Demand Savings Electricity Fees Savings Natural Gas Savings Solid Waste (non-haz) Savings Administrative Changes Savings Increase in Production Savings
*Savings and costs are best estimates based on the center's site visit, associated engineering analysis, and typical capital and labor costs