ITAC Assessment: MO0288
ITAC logo
ITAC Assessment: MO0288
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
Assessment Year 2000
Principal Product Pellet Rifles and Pistols
NAICS
n/a
SIC 3484: Small Arms
Sales Range $10
M
to 50
M
# of Employees 150
Plant Area 104,000
ft2
Annual Production 500,000
pieces
Production Hrs. Annual 3,120
hrs
Location (State) Missouri

Facility Energy Cost and Usage

Source Yearly Cost Usage
Electricity Usage $47,112 1,329,426
kWh
Electricity Demand $15,406 341
kW-mo/yr
Electricity Fees $3,481 -
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS -
RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* $14,954 *Non-energy impacts included in savings.
IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* -

Recommendations

# Description Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Status Electricity Usage Savings Electricity Demand Savings Solid Waste (non-haz) Savings Ancillary Material Cost Savings
01 2.7142: Utilize higher efficiency lamps and/or ballasts $952 $2,528 $681
17,878
kWh
$271
-
kW-mo/yr
- -
02 2.4133: Use most efficient type of electric motors $761 $1,360 $625
16,413
kWh
$136
-
kW-mo/yr
- -
03 2.4221: Install compressor air intakes in coolest locations $504 $40 $368
9,672
kWh
$136
-
kW-mo/yr
- -
04 2.4231: Reduce the pressure of compressed air to the minimum required $157 $118 $112
2,931
kWh
$45
-
kW-mo/yr
- -
05 3.7198: Reduce / eliminate use of disposable product $1,348 $720 - - $1,348
-
lb
-
06 4.514: Re-arrange equipment layout to reduce handling costs $6,739 $1,000 - - - $6,739
07 4.111: Add equipment/ operators to reduce production bottleneck $4,493 $2,000 - - - $4,493
TOTAL RECOMMENDED $14,954 $7,766 $1,786
46,894
kWh
$588
-
kW-mo/yr
$1,348
-
lb
$11,232
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED - - - - - -
Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Electricity Usage Savings Electricity Demand Savings Solid Waste (non-haz) Savings Ancillary Material Cost Savings
*Savings and costs are best estimates based on the center's site visit, associated engineering analysis, and typical capital and labor costs