ITAC Assessment: MO0258
ITAC logo
ITAC Assessment: MO0258
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
Assessment Year 1999
Principal Product Jacketed Rifle and Pistol Projectiles
NAICS
n/a
SIC 3482: Small Arms Ammunition
Sales Range $10
M
to 50
M
# of Employees 84
Plant Area 43,000
ft2
Annual Production 116,200,000
pieces
Production Hrs. Annual 6,000
hrs
Location (State) Missouri

Facility Energy Cost and Usage

Source Yearly Cost Usage
Electricity Usage $72,287 1,648,007
kWh
Electricity Demand $10,354 418
kW-mo/yr
Electricity Fees $11,846 -
Natural Gas $29,630 5,219
MMBtu
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS -
RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* $73,210 *Non-energy impacts included in savings.
IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* $67,918

Recommendations

# Description Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Status Electricity Usage Savings Electricity Demand Savings Solid Waste (non-haz) Savings Personnel Changes Savings
01 2.7142: Utilize higher efficiency lamps and/or ballasts $3,911 $4,897 $3,584
70,340
kWh
$327
-
kW-mo/yr
- -
02 2.4133: Use most efficient type of electric motors $2,257 $3,392 $2,009
39,273
kWh
$248
-
kW-mo/yr
- -
03 2.4221: Install compressor air intakes in coolest locations $1,116 $49 $1,032
20,223
kWh
$84
-
kW-mo/yr
- -
04 2.4231: Reduce the pressure of compressed air to the minimum required $1,256 $40 $1,162
22,860
kWh
$94
-
kW-mo/yr
- -
05 4.111: Add equipment/ operators to reduce production bottleneck $1,750 $450 $1,668
19,637
kWh
$82
-
kW-mo/yr
- -
06 3.6192: Use a less expensive method of waste removal $2,460 - - - $2,460
-
lb
-
07 4.111: Add equipment/ operators to reduce production bottleneck $60,000 $27,500 - - - $60,000
08 2.7142: Utilize higher efficiency lamps and/or ballasts $460 $345 $165
3,224
kWh
$10
-
kW-mo/yr
- $285
TOTAL RECOMMENDED $73,210 $36,673 $9,620
175,557
kWh
$845
-
kW-mo/yr
$2,460
-
lb
$60,285
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED $67,918 $36,239 $7,261
129,250
kWh
$657
-
kW-mo/yr
- $60,000
Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Electricity Usage Savings Electricity Demand Savings Solid Waste (non-haz) Savings Personnel Changes Savings
*Savings and costs are best estimates based on the center's site visit, associated engineering analysis, and typical capital and labor costs