ITAC Assessment: MO0229
ITAC logo
ITAC Assessment: MO0229
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
Assessment Year 1998
Principal Product Various Colors of Ink
NAICS
n/a
SIC 2893: Printing Ink
Sales Range $50
M
to 100
M
# of Employees 70
Plant Area 80,000
ft2
Annual Production 25,000,000
lb
Production Hrs. Annual 6,240
hrs
Location (State) Missouri

Facility Energy Cost and Usage

Source Yearly Cost Usage
Electricity Usage $110,224 2,144,197
kWh
Electricity Demand $12,632 520
kW-mo/yr
Electricity Fees $16,103 -
Natural Gas $34,342 5,835
MMBtu
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS -
RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* $3,138,778 *Non-energy impacts included in savings.
IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* $13,639

Recommendations

# Description Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Status Electricity Usage Savings Electricity Demand Savings Solid Waste (non-haz) Savings Ancillary Material Cost Savings
01 3.1191: Change procedures / equipment / operating conditions $3,111,888 - - - - $3,111,888
02 4.611: Begin a practice of predictive / preventative maintenance $11,035 $3,700 - - - $11,035
03 2.7142: Utilize higher efficiency lamps and/or ballasts $3,548 $7,376 $3,160
53,634
kWh
$388
-
kW-mo/yr
- -
04 2.7142: Utilize higher efficiency lamps and/or ballasts $708 $1,568 $587
9,965
kWh
$121
-
kW-mo/yr
- -
05 2.4231: Reduce the pressure of compressed air to the minimum required $2,899 $40 $2,729
46,307
kWh
$170
-
kW-mo/yr
- -
06 2.4221: Install compressor air intakes in coolest locations $1,496 $52 $1,399
23,740
kWh
$97
-
kW-mo/yr
- -
07 2.4133: Use most efficient type of electric motors $6,484 $6,161 $6,096
103,458
kWh
$388
-
kW-mo/yr
- -
08 3.6192: Use a less expensive method of waste removal $720 $2,080 - - $720
-
lb
-
TOTAL RECOMMENDED $3,138,778 $20,977 $13,971
237,104
kWh
$1,164
-
kW-mo/yr
$720
-
lb
$3,122,923
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED $13,639 $15,145 $12,572
213,364
kWh
$1,067
-
kW-mo/yr
- -
Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Electricity Usage Savings Electricity Demand Savings Solid Waste (non-haz) Savings Ancillary Material Cost Savings
*Savings and costs are best estimates based on the center's site visit, associated engineering analysis, and typical capital and labor costs