ITAC Assessment: MA0416
ITAC logo
ITAC Assessment: MA0416
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
Assessment Year 1998
Principal Product Malleable Iron Castings
NAICS
n/a
SIC 3322: Malleable Iron Foundries
Sales Range $10
M
to 50
M
# of Employees 96
Plant Area 100,000
ft2
Annual Production 175,000
ton
Production Hrs. Annual 2,000
hrs
Location (State) Massachusetts

Facility Energy Cost and Usage

Source Yearly Cost Usage
Electricity Usage $154,000 2,241,208
kWh
Electricity Demand $112,751 11,896
kW-mo/yr
Natural Gas $19,440 9,767
MMBtu
Coal $482,713 55,642
MMBtu
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS -
RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* $161,583 *Non-energy impacts included in savings.
IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* $161,583

Recommendations

# Description Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Status Electricity Usage Savings Natural Gas Savings Solid Waste (non-haz) Savings Administrative Changes Savings
01 4.452: Eliminate shift $145,100 $250,000 - $(-54,900.0)
-
MMBtu
- $200,000
02 3.5222: Use sand for other purposes (eg construction fill, cover for municipal landfills) $13,356 $2,000 - - $13,356
-
lb
-
03 2.6231: Utilize controls to operate equipment only when needed $2,884 $1,000 $2,884
46,600
kWh
- - -
04 2.7135: Install occupancy sensors $243 $472 $243
3,517
kWh
- - -
TOTAL RECOMMENDED $161,583 $253,472 $3,127
50,117
kWh
$(-54,900.0)
-
MMBtu
$13,356
-
lb
$200,000
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED $161,583 $253,472 $3,127
50,117
kWh
$(-54,900.0)
-
MMBtu
$13,356
-
lb
$200,000
*Savings and costs are best estimates based on the center's site visit, associated engineering analysis, and typical capital and labor costs