Assessment Year | 1989 |
---|---|
Principal Product | RUBBERIZED FUEL TANKS |
NAICS |
n/a
|
SIC | 3069: Fabricated Rubber Products, Not Elsewhere Classified |
Sales Range | $10 M to 50M |
# of Employees | 490 |
Plant Area |
n/a
|
Annual Production | 5,000
pieces
|
Production Hrs. Annual | 2,496
hrs
|
Location (State) | Arkansas |
Facility Energy Cost and Usage
Source | Yearly Cost | Usage | Unit Cost | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Electricity Usage | $457,741 | 7,060,082 |
kWh
|
$0.065 |
Natural Gas | $238,139 | 77,164 |
MMBtu
|
$3.09 |
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS | - | |||
RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* | $236,961 |
See individual recommendations below
*Non-energy impacts included in savings.
|
||
IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* | $18,728 |
Recommendations
# | Description | Yearly Savings* | Imp'd Cost* | Status | Electricity Usage Savings | Natural Gas Savings | Administrative Changes Savings |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01 | 3.6192: Use a less expensive method of waste removal | $214,983 | $77,904 | - |
$16,695
-
MMBtu
|
$198,288 | |
02 | 2.1233: Analyze flue gas for proper air/fuel ratio | $7,542 | $442 | - |
$8,142
-
MMBtu
|
$(-600.0) | |
03 | 2.1233: Analyze flue gas for proper air/fuel ratio | $2,008 | $442 | - |
$2,008
-
MMBtu
|
- | |
04 | 2.2414: Use waste heat from hot flue gases to preheat | $2,470 | $400 | - |
$2,470
-
MMBtu
|
- | |
05 | 2.7261: Install timers and/or thermostats | $3,092 | $200 |
$2,555
52,755
kWh
|
$537
-
MMBtu
|
- | |
06 | 2.7142: Utilize higher efficiency lamps and/or ballasts | $3,250 | $754 |
$3,250
55,393
kWh
|
- | - | |
07 | 2.2136: Install / repair insulation on steam lines | $423 | $100 | - |
$423
-
MMBtu
|
- | |
08 | 2.2135: Repair and eliminate steam leaks | $3,193 | $224 | - |
$3,193
-
MMBtu
|
- | |
TOTAL RECOMMENDED | $236,961 | $80,466 |
$5,805
108,148
kWh
|
$33,468
-
MMBtu
|
$197,688 | ||
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED | $18,728 | $1,808 |
$2,555
52,755
kWh
|
$16,773
-
MMBtu
|
$(-600.0) | ||
Yearly Savings* | Imp'd Cost* | Electricity Usage Savings | Natural Gas Savings | Administrative Changes Savings |
*Savings and costs are best estimates based on the center's site visit, associated engineering analysis, and typical capital and labor costs