ITAC logo
ITAC Assessment: LM0030
ITAC logo
ITAC Assessment: LM0030
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
See Complete Announcement
Grant Program - Open Solicitation
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
Find Something New - Open Random Assessment MAIN ITAC SITE VERSION [FOR BETA TESTING ONLY]
Loyola Marymount University Loyola Marymount University
Assessment Year 2002
Principal Product seamless rolled rings
NAICS
n/a
SIC 3462: Iron and Steel Forgings
Sales Range $50
M
to 100
M
# of Employees 430
Plant Area 113,000
ft2
Annual Production 9,773,963
lb
Production Hrs. Annual 4,318
hrs
Location (State) California

Facility Energy Cost and Usage

Source Yearly Cost Usage
Electricity Usage $949,910 11,975,867
kWh
Electricity Demand $329,061 33,132
kW-mo/yr
Electricity Fees $121,478 -
Natural Gas $1,466,230 140,522
MMBtu
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS -
RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* $1,435,120 *Non-energy impacts included in savings.
IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* $115,143

Recommendations

# Description Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Status Electricity Usage Savings Electricity Demand Savings Electricity Fees Savings Natural Gas Savings Personnel Changes Savings
01 2.2511: Insulate bare equipment $35,921 $34,056 - - - $35,921
-
MMBtu
-
02 2.2414: Use waste heat from hot flue gases to preheat $341,748 $600,000 - - - $341,748
-
MMBtu
-
03 2.4221: Install compressor air intakes in coolest locations $789 $556 $657
6,118
kWh
$132
-
kW-mo/yr
- - -
04 2.4236: Eliminate leaks in inert gas and compressed air lines/ valves $1,806 $350 $2,233
20,816
kWh
$355
-
kW-mo/yr
- - $(-782.0)
05 2.4133: Use most efficient type of electric motors $14,427 $14,304 $12,602
117,380
kWh
$1,825
-
kW-mo/yr
- - -
06 2.7111: Reduce illumination to minimum necessary levels $16,635 $17,700 $11,374
105,948
kWh
$5,261
-
kW-mo/yr
- - -
07 2.3131: Reschedule plant operations or reduce load to avoid peaks $115,143 $300 - $73,818
-
kW-mo/yr
$41,325 - -
08 2.4146: Use adjustable frequency drive or multiple speed motors on existing system $86,071 $175,000 $54,764
510,149
kWh
$31,307
-
kW-mo/yr
- - -
09 4.513: Re-arrange equipment layout to reduce labor costs $600,000 $3,100 - - - - $600,000
10 4.652: Replace existing equipment with more suitable substitutes $220,500 $700,000 - - - - $220,500
11 4.652: Replace existing equipment with more suitable substitutes $2,080 $224 - - - - $2,080
TOTAL RECOMMENDED $1,435,120 $1,545,590 $81,630
760,411
kWh
$112,698
-
kW-mo/yr
$41,325 $377,669
-
MMBtu
$821,798
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED $115,143 $300 - $73,818
-
kW-mo/yr
$41,325 - -
Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Electricity Usage Savings Electricity Demand Savings Electricity Fees Savings Natural Gas Savings Personnel Changes Savings
*Savings and costs are best estimates based on the center's site visit, associated engineering analysis, and typical capital and labor costs