ITAC Assessment: KU0184
ITAC logo
ITAC Assessment: KU0184
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
Assessment Year 1986
Principal Product PRINTING INK
NAICS
n/a
SIC 2893: Printing Ink
Sales Range $5
M
to 10
M
# of Employees 59
Plant Area
n/a
Annual Production 4,000,000
lb
Production Hrs. Annual 6,370
hrs
Location (State) Missouri

Facility Energy Cost and Usage

Source Yearly Cost Usage
Electricity Usage $54,749 664,713
kWh
Natural Gas $17,477 4,022
MMBtu
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS -
RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* $3,952 *Non-energy impacts included in savings.
IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* -

Recommendations

# Description Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Status Electricity Usage Savings Natural Gas Savings Administrative Changes Savings
01 2.4312: Improve lubrication practices $327 - $1,207
14,654
kWh
- $(-880.0)
02 2.7142: Utilize higher efficiency lamps and/or ballasts $989 $1,087 $989
12,016
kWh
- -
03 2.1233: Analyze flue gas for proper air/fuel ratio $1,331 - - $1,371
-
MMBtu
$(-40.0)
04 2.7441: Replace broken windows and/or window sash $495 $72 - $495
-
MMBtu
-
05 2.2211: Use optimum temperature $545 $50 $627
7,620
kWh
$(-82.0)
-
MMBtu
-
06 2.4111: Utilize energy-efficient belts and other improved mechanisms $265 - $265
3,224
kWh
- -
TOTAL RECOMMENDED $3,952 $1,209 $3,088
37,514
kWh
$1,784
-
MMBtu
$(-920.0)
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED - - - - -
Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Electricity Usage Savings Natural Gas Savings Administrative Changes Savings
*Savings and costs are best estimates based on the center's site visit, associated engineering analysis, and typical capital and labor costs