ITAC Assessment: IP0118
ITAC logo
ITAC Assessment: IP0118
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
Assessment Year 2019
Principal Product Cylinder
NAICS 333244: Printing Machinery and Equipment Manufacturing
SIC 3555: Printing Trades Machinery and Equipment
Sales Range $5
M
to 10
M
# of Employees 40
Plant Area 137,819
ft2
Annual Production 4,000
units
Production Hrs. Annual 2,184
hrs
Location (State) Indiana

Facility Energy Cost and Usage

Source Yearly Cost Usage
Electricity Usage $156,056 1,885,367
kWh
Electricity Demand $18,177 4,457
kW-mo/yr
Electricity Fees $1,045 -
Natural Gas $7,318 926
MMBtu
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS $182,596
RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* $12,174 *Non-energy impacts included in savings.
IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* $11,129

Recommendations

# Description Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Status Electricity Usage Savings Electricity Demand Savings
01 2.4231: Reduce the pressure of compressed air to the minimum required $4,954 $824 $4,954
59,850
kWh
-
02 2.4236: Eliminate leaks in inert gas and compressed air lines/ valves $3,154 $1,526 $3,154
38,106
kWh
-
03 2.4221: Install compressor air intakes in coolest locations $1,045 $2,439 $979
11,826
kWh
$66
-
kW-mo/yr
04 2.7142: Utilize higher efficiency lamps and/or ballasts $3,021 $10,215 $2,735
33,047
kWh
$286
-
kW-mo/yr
TOTAL RECOMMENDED $12,174 $15,004 $11,822
142,829
kWh
$352
-
kW-mo/yr
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED $11,129 $12,565 $10,843
131,003
kWh
$286
-
kW-mo/yr
*Savings and costs are best estimates based on the center's site visit, associated engineering analysis, and typical capital and labor costs