Assessment Year | 2000 |
---|---|
Principal Product | Machine Services & Castings |
NAICS |
n/a
|
SIC | 3399: Primary Metal Products, Not Elsewhere Classified |
Sales Range | $10 M to 50M |
# of Employees | 120 |
Plant Area |
70,000
ft2
|
Annual Production | 370
ton
|
Production Hrs. Annual | 6,120
hrs
|
Location (State) | Pennsylvania |
Facility Energy Cost and Usage
Source | Yearly Cost | Usage | Unit Cost | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Electricity Usage | $130,671 | 3,342,321 |
kWh
|
$0.039 |
Electricity Demand | $96,687 | 11,501 |
kW-mo/yr
|
$8.41 |
Electricity Fees | $3,341 | - |
|
- |
Natural Gas | $47,996 | 6,786 |
MMBtu
|
$7.07 |
LPG | $37,253 | 6,695 |
MMBtu
|
$5.56 |
Fuel Oil #2 | $26,092 | 3,705 |
MMBtu
|
$7.04 |
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS | - | |||
RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* | $620,679 |
See individual recommendations below
*Non-energy impacts included in savings.
|
||
IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* | $13,133 |
Recommendations
# | Description | Yearly Savings* | Imp'd Cost* | Status | Electricity Usage Savings | Electricity Demand Savings | Electricity Fees Savings | Other Liquid (haz) Savings | Solid Waste (non-haz) Savings | One-time Revenue or Avoided Cost Savings |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01 | 2.7142: Utilize higher efficiency lamps and/or ballasts | $13,133 | $35,343 |
$8,837
201,934
kWh
|
$4,296
-
kW-mo/yr
|
- | - | - | - | |
02 | 2.7111: Reduce illumination to minimum necessary levels | $6,004 | - |
$6,004
130,129
kWh
|
- | - | - | - | - | |
03 | 2.7135: Install occupancy sensors | $11,219 | $2,000 |
$11,219
255,862
kWh
|
- | - | - | - | - | |
04 | 2.4236: Eliminate leaks in inert gas and compressed air lines/ valves | $252 | $600 |
$252
5,569
kWh
|
- | - | - | - | - | |
05 | 2.4227: Use compressor air filters | $2,211 | $150 |
$2,211
77,960
kWh
|
- | - | - | - | - | |
06 | 2.4221: Install compressor air intakes in coolest locations | $1,237 | $1,200 |
$832
17,585
kWh
|
$405
-
kW-mo/yr
|
- | - | - | - | |
07 | 2.3511: Use plant owned transformers or lease transformers | $18,455 | $60,000 | - | - | $18,455 | - | - | - | |
08 | 2.3212: Optimize plant power factor | $2,647 | $4,134 | - | - | $2,647 | - | - | - | |
09 | 4.424: Improve space comfort conditioning | $18,360 | $8,000 | - | - | - | - | - | $18,360 | |
10 | 4.513: Re-arrange equipment layout to reduce labor costs | $61,200 | $640 | - | - | - | - | - | $61,200 | |
11 | 4.424: Improve space comfort conditioning | $11,520 | $724 | - | - | - | - | - | $11,520 | |
12 | 4.611: Begin a practice of predictive / preventative maintenance | $2,400 | $1,035 | - | - | - | - | - | $2,400 | |
13 | 4.611: Begin a practice of predictive / preventative maintenance | $840 | $25 | - | - | - | - | - | $840 | |
14 | 4.521: Clear and rent existing space | $341,986 | $1,000 | - | - | - | - | - | $341,986 | |
15 | 4.321: Optimize production lot sizes and inventories | $7,800 | $5,000 | - | - | - | - | - | $7,800 | |
16 | 4.513: Re-arrange equipment layout to reduce labor costs | $16,380 | - | - | - | - | - | - | $16,380 | |
17 | 3.7223: Install shrouding on machines to prevent splashing | $2,295 | $2,000 | - | - | - | - | - | $2,295 | |
18 | 4.611: Begin a practice of predictive / preventative maintenance | $1,500 | $368 | - | - | - | - | - | $1,500 | |
19 | 4.611: Begin a practice of predictive / preventative maintenance | $5,360 | $6,240 | - | - | - | - | - | $5,360 | |
20 | 3.7311: Maintain machines to reduce leaks | $2,280 | $240 | - | - | - |
$2,280
-
gal
|
- | - | |
21 | 3.5311: Recover and reuse waste material | $93,600 | $500 | - | - | - | - |
$93,600
-
lb
|
- | |
TOTAL RECOMMENDED | $620,679 | $129,199 |
$29,355
689,039
kWh
|
$4,701
-
kW-mo/yr
|
$21,102 |
$2,280
-
gal
|
$93,600
-
lb
|
$469,641 | ||
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED | $13,133 | $35,343 |
$8,837
201,934
kWh
|
$4,296
-
kW-mo/yr
|
- | - | - | - | ||
Yearly Savings* | Imp'd Cost* | Electricity Usage Savings | Electricity Demand Savings | Electricity Fees Savings | Other Liquid (haz) Savings | Solid Waste (non-haz) Savings | One-time Revenue or Avoided Cost Savings |
*Savings and costs are best estimates based on the center's site visit, associated engineering analysis, and typical capital and labor costs