Assessment Year | 2000 |
---|---|
Principal Product | Truck Equipment |
NAICS |
n/a
|
SIC | 3713: Truck and Bus Bodies |
Sales Range | $50 M to 100M |
# of Employees | 250 |
Plant Area |
330,830
ft2
|
Annual Production | 7,000
pieces
|
Production Hrs. Annual | 2,080
hrs
|
Location (State) | Pennsylvania |
Facility Energy Cost and Usage
Source | Yearly Cost | Usage | Unit Cost | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Electricity Usage | $86,489 | 2,134,525 |
kWh
|
$0.041 |
Electricity Demand | $80,370 | 9,414 |
kW-mo/yr
|
$8.54 |
Electricity Fees | $11,077 | - |
|
- |
LPG | $92,127 | 11,033 |
MMBtu
|
$8.35 |
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS | - | |||
RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* | $358,935 |
See individual recommendations below
*Non-energy impacts included in savings.
|
||
IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* | $51,988 |
Recommendations
# | Description | Yearly Savings* | Imp'd Cost* | Status | Electricity Usage Savings | Electricity Demand Savings | Electricity Fees Savings | LPG Savings | One-time Revenue or Avoided Cost Savings |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01 | 2.7124: Make a practice of turning off lights when not needed | $1,311 | - |
$1,311
32,825
kWh
|
- | - | - | - | |
02 | 2.7111: Reduce illumination to minimum necessary levels | $1,704 | $1,408 |
$762
19,050
kWh
|
$942
-
kW-mo/yr
|
- | - | - | |
03 | 2.4231: Reduce the pressure of compressed air to the minimum required | $1,582 | $60 |
$707
17,878
kWh
|
$875
-
kW-mo/yr
|
- | - | - | |
04 | 2.4221: Install compressor air intakes in coolest locations | $1,607 | $1,200 |
$725
17,878
kWh
|
$882
-
kW-mo/yr
|
- | - | - | |
05 | 2.4236: Eliminate leaks in inert gas and compressed air lines/ valves | $31,378 | $800 |
$31,378
785,170
kWh
|
- | - | - | - | |
06 | 2.4226: Use / purchase optimum sized compressor | $11,189 | $21,600 |
$5,049
124,853
kWh
|
$6,140
-
kW-mo/yr
|
- | - | - | |
07 | 2.4239: Eliminate or reduce compressed air usage | $1,044 | $1,400 |
$1,044
26,084
kWh
|
- | - | - | - | |
08 | 2.3511: Use plant owned transformers or lease transformers | $6,919 | $20,000 | - | - | $6,919 | - | - | |
09 | 2.3212: Optimize plant power factor | $9,937 | $11,490 | - | - | $9,937 | - | - | |
10 | 2.6218: Turn off equipment when not in use | $1,493 | - |
$1,493
16,706
kWh
|
- | - | - | - | |
11 | 2.6218: Turn off equipment when not in use | $2,235 | - |
$2,235
56,272
kWh
|
- | - | - | - | |
12 | 2.7442: Keep doors and windows shut when not on use | $2,714 | - | - | - | - |
$2,714
-
MMBtu
|
- | |
13 | 4.424: Improve space comfort conditioning | $1,560 | $600 | - | - | - | - | $1,560 | |
14 | 4.111: Add equipment/ operators to reduce production bottleneck | $20,800 | $5,000 | - | - | - | - | $20,800 | |
15 | 4.111: Add equipment/ operators to reduce production bottleneck | $4,666 | $500 | - | - | - | - | $4,666 | |
16 | 4.111: Add equipment/ operators to reduce production bottleneck | $39,375 | $500 | - | - | - | - | $39,375 | |
17 | 4.111: Add equipment/ operators to reduce production bottleneck | $6,240 | $500 | - | - | - | - | $6,240 | |
18 | 4.131: Modify process to reduce material use/cost | $32,340 | - | - | - | - | - | $32,340 | |
19 | 4.131: Modify process to reduce material use/cost | $6,836 | $600 | - | - | - | - | $6,836 | |
20 | 4.611: Begin a practice of predictive / preventative maintenance | $1,440 | $968 | - | - | - | - | $1,440 | |
21 | 4.611: Begin a practice of predictive / preventative maintenance | $2,000 | $250 | - | - | - | - | $2,000 | |
22 | 4.511: Expand operations into unused space | $153,465 | $300,000 | - | - | - | - | $153,465 | |
23 | 3.6193: Install equipment (eg compactor) to reduce disposal costs | $17,100 | $6,500 | - | - | - | - | $17,100 | |
TOTAL RECOMMENDED | $358,935 | $373,376 |
$44,704
1,096,716
kWh
|
$8,839
-
kW-mo/yr
|
$16,856 |
$2,714
-
MMBtu
|
$285,822 | ||
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED | $51,988 | $4,218 |
$5,317
112,543
kWh
|
$1,817
-
kW-mo/yr
|
- |
$2,714
-
MMBtu
|
$42,140 | ||
Yearly Savings* | Imp'd Cost* | Electricity Usage Savings | Electricity Demand Savings | Electricity Fees Savings | LPG Savings | One-time Revenue or Avoided Cost Savings |
*Savings and costs are best estimates based on the center's site visit, associated engineering analysis, and typical capital and labor costs