ITAC Assessment: GT0168
ITAC logo
ITAC Assessment: GT0168
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
Assessment Year 1983
Principal Product UROLOGICAL SUPPLIES
NAICS
n/a
SIC 3841: Surgical and Medical Instruments and Apparatus
Sales Range $50
M
to 100
M
# of Employees 375
Plant Area
n/a
Annual Production 20,000,000
pieces
Production Hrs. Annual 4,335
hrs
Location (State) Georgia

Facility Energy Cost and Usage

Source Yearly Cost Usage
Electricity Usage $133,296 2,832,063
kWh
Natural Gas $94,298 20,666
MMBtu
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS -
RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* $50,280 *Non-energy impacts included in savings.
IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* -

Recommendations

# Description Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Status Electricity Usage Savings Natural Gas Savings
01 2.2443: Re-use or recycle hot or cold process exhaust air $38,600 $12,000 - $38,600
-
MMBtu
02 2.7243: Improve air circulation with destratification fans / other methods $9,857 $12,600 - $9,857
-
MMBtu
03 2.1233: Analyze flue gas for proper air/fuel ratio $1,090 $500 - $1,090
-
MMBtu
04 2.2135: Repair and eliminate steam leaks $198 $50 - $198
-
MMBtu
05 2.4221: Install compressor air intakes in coolest locations $269 $500 $269
5,862
kWh
-
06 2.7142: Utilize higher efficiency lamps and/or ballasts $266 $540 $266
5,569
kWh
-
TOTAL RECOMMENDED $50,280 $26,190 $535
11,431
kWh
$49,745
-
MMBtu
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED - - - -
Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Electricity Usage Savings Natural Gas Savings
*Savings and costs are best estimates based on the center's site visit, associated engineering analysis, and typical capital and labor costs