ITAC Assessment: DS0090
ITAC logo
ITAC Assessment: DS0090
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
Assessment Year 1997
Principal Product Fine Line Computer Components
NAICS
n/a
SIC 3231: Glass Products, Made of Purchased Glass
Sales Range $10
M
to 50
M
# of Employees 230
Plant Area 116,800
ft2
Annual Production 1,500,000
pieces
Production Hrs. Annual 5,200
hrs
Location (State) Minnesota

Facility Energy Cost and Usage

Source Yearly Cost Usage
Electricity Usage $114,092 6,421,747
kWh
Electricity Demand $94,685 14,076
kW-mo/yr
Electricity Fees $2,237 -
Natural Gas $63,908 21,825
MMBtu
LPG $14,800 1,385
MMBtu
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS -
RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* $128,759 *Non-energy impacts included in savings.
IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* $117,929

Recommendations

# Description Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Status Electricity Usage Savings Electricity Demand Savings Natural Gas Savings LPG Savings Water Disposal Savings Solid Waste (non-haz) Savings Personnel Changes Savings Ancillary Material Cost Savings Water Consumption Savings
01 2.4221: Install compressor air intakes in coolest locations $1,097 $1,800 $766
42,497
kWh
$331
-
kW-mo/yr
- - - - - - -
02 2.1233: Analyze flue gas for proper air/fuel ratio $2,210 $1,910 - - $1,692
-
MMBtu
$518
-
MMBtu
- - - - -
03 2.2514: Cover open tanks $634 $242 - - $634
-
MMBtu
- - - - - -
04 2.2628: Utilize a less expensive cooling method $16,937 $20,000 $(-1,092.0)
(-60,668)
kWh
$(-853.0)
-
kW-mo/yr
- - $13,342
-
Tgal
- - - $5,540
-
Tgal
05 3.6192: Use a less expensive method of waste removal $10,196 $32,400 $(-405.0)
(-22,567)
kWh
$(-3,443.0)
-
kW-mo/yr
- - - $16,384
-
lb
$(-2,340.0) - -
06 3.4116: Meter recycled water (to reduce sewer charges) $13,735 $9,500 - - - - $13,735
-
Tgal
- - - -
07 2.1335: Replace gasoline with diesel, lpg, or natural gas $13,750 $19,000 - - - - - - - $13,750 -
08 4.514: Re-arrange equipment layout to reduce handling costs $70,200 $65,000 - - - - - - $70,200 - -
TOTAL RECOMMENDED $128,759 $149,852 $(-731.0)
(-40,738)
kWh
$(-3,965.0)
-
kW-mo/yr
$2,326
-
MMBtu
$518
-
MMBtu
$27,077
-
Tgal
$16,384
-
lb
$67,860 $13,750 $5,540
-
Tgal
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED $117,929 $117,210 $(-326.0)
(-18,171)
kWh
$(-522.0)
-
kW-mo/yr
$1,692
-
MMBtu
$518
-
MMBtu
$27,077
-
Tgal
- $70,200 $13,750 $5,540
-
Tgal
Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Electricity Usage Savings Electricity Demand Savings Natural Gas Savings LPG Savings Water Disposal Savings Solid Waste (non-haz) Savings Personnel Changes Savings Ancillary Material Cost Savings Water Consumption Savings
*Savings and costs are best estimates based on the center's site visit, associated engineering analysis, and typical capital and labor costs