ITAC Assessment: CO0433
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
Assessment Year 1999
Principal Product thermoformed plastic components
NAICS
n/a
SIC 3089: Plastics Products, Not Elsewhere Classified
Sales Range $1
M
to 5
M
# of Employees 11
Plant Area 19,000
ft2
Annual Production 8,790,000
pieces
Production Hrs. Annual 2,184
hrs
Location (State) Colorado

Facility Energy Cost and Usage

Source Yearly Cost Usage
Electricity Usage $9,542 538,394
kWh
Electricity Demand $44,585 3,270
kW-mo/yr
Electricity Fees $204 -
Natural Gas $5,757 1,049
MMBtu
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS -
RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* $77,061 *Non-energy impacts included in savings.
IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* -

Recommendations

# Description Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Status Electricity Usage Savings Electricity Demand Savings Natural Gas Savings Solid Waste (non-haz) Savings Solid Waste (haz) Savings Personnel Changes Savings
01 2.3131: Reschedule plant operations or reduce load to avoid peaks $1,630 $1,400 - $1,630
-
kW-mo/yr
- - - -
02 2.2437: Recover waste heat from equipment $1,250 $600 - - $1,250
-
MMBtu
- - -
03 2.7142: Utilize higher efficiency lamps and/or ballasts $441 $1,208 $98
5,569
kWh
$343
-
kW-mo/yr
- - - -
04 2.6212: Turn off equipment during breaks, reduce operating time $960 - $960
53,927
kWh
- - - - -
05 2.4221: Install compressor air intakes in coolest locations $460 $420 $90
4,982
kWh
$370
-
kW-mo/yr
- - - -
06 3.6192: Use a less expensive method of waste removal $340 - - - - $340
-
lb
- -
07 3.6192: Use a less expensive method of waste removal $220 $20 - - - - $220
-
lb
-
08 4.111: Add equipment/ operators to reduce production bottleneck $71,760 $60,000 - - - - - $71,760
TOTAL RECOMMENDED $77,061 $63,648 $1,148
64,478
kWh
$2,343
-
kW-mo/yr
$1,250
-
MMBtu
$340
-
lb
$220
-
lb
$71,760
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED - - - - - - - -
Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Electricity Usage Savings Electricity Demand Savings Natural Gas Savings Solid Waste (non-haz) Savings Solid Waste (haz) Savings Personnel Changes Savings
*Savings and costs are best estimates based on the center's site visit, associated engineering analysis, and typical capital and labor costs