ITAC Assessment: CO0411
ITAC logo
ITAC Assessment: CO0411
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
Assessment Year 1998
Principal Product asphalt shingles
NAICS
n/a
SIC 2952: Asphalt Felts and Coatings
Sales Range $10
M
to 50
M
# of Employees 85
Plant Area 180,000
ft2
Annual Production 2,000,000
pieces
Production Hrs. Annual 6,240
hrs
Location (State) Colorado

Facility Energy Cost and Usage

Source Yearly Cost Usage
Electricity Usage $47,460 2,882,181
kWh
Electricity Demand $86,397 6,379
kW-mo/yr
Electricity Fees $3,576 -
Natural Gas $106,709 41,042
MMBtu
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS -
RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* $352,303 *Non-energy impacts included in savings.
IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* $274,393

Recommendations

# Description Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Status Electricity Usage Savings Electricity Demand Savings Natural Gas Savings Water Disposal Savings Solid Waste (non-haz) Savings Personnel Changes Savings Ancillary Material Cost Savings Water Consumption Savings
01 2.4133: Use most efficient type of electric motors $290 $523 $107
6,155
kWh
$183
-
kW-mo/yr
- - - - - -
02 2.4231: Reduce the pressure of compressed air to the minimum required $1,480 $100 $590
34,291
kWh
$890
-
kW-mo/yr
- - - - - -
03 2.4221: Install compressor air intakes in coolest locations $460 $660 $180
10,551
kWh
$280
-
kW-mo/yr
- - - - - -
04 3.5314: Use in-process recycling whenever possible $102,860 $72,000 - - $(-740.0)
-
MMBtu
- $12,600
-
lb
- $91,000 -
05 3.5313: Increase amount of waste recovered for resale $68,610 $200,000 $(-8,730.0)
(-503,810)
kWh
$(-13,100.0)
-
kW-mo/yr
- - $90,440
-
lb
- - -
06 3.4111: Use closed cycle process to minimize waste water production $26,243 $21,600 $(-750.0)
(-43,376)
kWh
$(-1,120.0)
-
kW-mo/yr
- $12,347
-
Tgal
- - - $15,766
-
Tgal
07 3.1192: Reduce scrap production $8,840 $45,000 - - - - $8,840
-
lb
- - -
08 4.441: Install automatic packing equipment $143,520 $17,500 - - - - - $143,520 - -
TOTAL RECOMMENDED $352,303 $357,383 $(-8,603.0)
(-496,189)
kWh
$(-12,867.0)
-
kW-mo/yr
$(-740.0)
-
MMBtu
$12,347
-
Tgal
$111,880
-
lb
$143,520 $91,000 $15,766
-
Tgal
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED $274,393 $111,723 $(-53.0)
(-2,930)
kWh
$(-47.0)
-
kW-mo/yr
$(-740.0)
-
MMBtu
$12,347
-
Tgal
$12,600
-
lb
$143,520 $91,000 $15,766
-
Tgal
Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Electricity Usage Savings Electricity Demand Savings Natural Gas Savings Water Disposal Savings Solid Waste (non-haz) Savings Personnel Changes Savings Ancillary Material Cost Savings Water Consumption Savings
*Savings and costs are best estimates based on the center's site visit, associated engineering analysis, and typical capital and labor costs