ITAC Assessment: CO0382
ITAC logo
ITAC Assessment: CO0382
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
Assessment Year 1997
Principal Product soft drinks
NAICS
n/a
SIC 2086: Bottled and Canned Soft Drinks and Carbonated Waters
Sales Range $10
M
to 50
M
# of Employees 350
Plant Area 176,000
ft2
Annual Production 372,000,000
pieces
Production Hrs. Annual 6,820
hrs
Location (State) Colorado

Facility Energy Cost and Usage

Source Yearly Cost Usage
Electricity Usage $129,942 4,789,566
kWh
Electricity Demand $118,090 10,033
kW-mo/yr
Natural Gas $87,442 28,826
MMBtu
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS -
RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* $349,100 *Non-energy impacts included in savings.
IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* $33,356

Recommendations

# Description Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Status Electricity Usage Savings Electricity Demand Savings Natural Gas Savings Water Disposal Savings Other Liquid (haz) Savings Solid Waste (haz) Savings Personnel Changes Savings Ancillary Material Cost Savings Water Consumption Savings Primary Product Savings By-product Production Savings
01 2.4239: Eliminate or reduce compressed air usage $12,200 $1,700 $6,920
254,982
kWh
$5,280
-
kW-mo/yr
- - - - - - - - -
02 2.7142: Utilize higher efficiency lamps and/or ballasts $6,662 $21,489 $4,142
152,696
kWh
$2,520
-
kW-mo/yr
- - - - - - - - -
03 2.4133: Use most efficient type of electric motors $424 $1,142 $240
8,792
kWh
$184
-
kW-mo/yr
- - - - - - - - -
04 2.2437: Recover waste heat from equipment $3,260 $7,500 - - $3,260
-
MMBtu
- - - - - - - -
05 2.4221: Install compressor air intakes in coolest locations $1,430 $430 $810
29,894
kWh
$620
-
kW-mo/yr
- - - - - - - - -
06 3.4111: Use closed cycle process to minimize waste water production $11,220 $2,740 - - - $7,290
-
Tgal
- - - - $3,930
-
Tgal
- -
07 3.5315: Lease / purchase baler; sell cardboard to recycler $11,210 $24,250 $(-20.0)
(-586)
kWh
- - - - - $(-2,570.0) - - - $13,800
08 3.5317: Sell / offer by-product as animal feed $1,430 $5,000 - - - $1,430
-
Tgal
- - - - - - -
09 3.8132: Use less toxic and volatile solvent substitutes $264 $1,790 - - - - $539
-
gal
$(-16.0)
-
lb
- $(-259.0) - - -
10 4.624: Hire additional personnel to reduce changeout time $301,000 $25,000 - - - - - - $(-38,000.0) - - $339,000 -
TOTAL RECOMMENDED $349,100 $91,041 $12,092
445,778
kWh
$8,604
-
kW-mo/yr
$3,260
-
MMBtu
$8,720
-
Tgal
$539
-
gal
$(-16.0)
-
lb
$(-40,570.0) $(-259.0) $3,930
-
Tgal
$339,000 $13,800
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED $33,356 $54,011 $12,092
445,778
kWh
$8,604
-
kW-mo/yr
- $1,430
-
Tgal
- - $(-2,570.0) - - - $13,800
Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Electricity Usage Savings Electricity Demand Savings Natural Gas Savings Water Disposal Savings Other Liquid (haz) Savings Solid Waste (haz) Savings Personnel Changes Savings Ancillary Material Cost Savings Water Consumption Savings Primary Product Savings By-product Production Savings
*Savings and costs are best estimates based on the center's site visit, associated engineering analysis, and typical capital and labor costs