Assessment Year | 2003 |
---|---|
Principal Product | Molded & Profile Products |
NAICS | 326199: All Other Plastics Product Manufacturing |
SIC | 3089: Plastics Products, Not Elsewhere Classified |
Sales Range | $10 M to 50M |
# of Employees | 130 |
Plant Area |
41,260
ft2
|
Annual Production | 25,000,000
lb
|
Production Hrs. Annual | 7,944
hrs
|
Location (State) | Indiana |
Facility Energy Cost and Usage
Source | Yearly Cost | Usage | Unit Cost | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Electricity Usage | $309,393 | 10,416,280 |
kWh
|
$0.030 |
Electricity Demand | $164,608 | 19,140 |
kW-mo/yr
|
$8.60 |
Natural Gas | $12,164 | 1,434 |
MMBtu
|
$8.48 |
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS | - | |||
RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* | $62,655 |
See individual recommendations below
*Non-energy impacts included in savings.
|
||
IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* | $49,129 |
Recommendations
# | Description | Yearly Savings* | Imp'd Cost* | Status | Electricity Usage Savings | Electricity Demand Savings | Solid Waste (non-haz) Savings | Personnel Changes Savings | Administrative Changes Savings | Ancillary Material Cost Savings | One-time Revenue or Avoided Cost Savings |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01 | 2.3137: Use power during off-peak periods | $8,991 | $2,000 |
$4,785
161,128
kWh
|
$4,206
-
kW-mo/yr
|
- | - | - | - | - | |
02 | 2.7142: Utilize higher efficiency lamps and/or ballasts | $5,603 | $6,590 |
$3,073
103,413
kWh
|
$1,343
-
kW-mo/yr
|
- | $712 | - | $475 | - | |
03 | 2.4133: Use most efficient type of electric motors | $4,593 | $11,310 |
$3,450
116,229
kWh
|
$1,143
-
kW-mo/yr
|
- | - | - | - | - | |
04 | 2.4231: Reduce the pressure of compressed air to the minimum required | $3,614 | - |
$2,514
84,650
kWh
|
$1,100
-
kW-mo/yr
|
- | - | - | - | - | |
05 | 2.4111: Utilize energy-efficient belts and other improved mechanisms | $1,735 | $110 |
$1,307
44,000
kWh
|
$428
-
kW-mo/yr
|
- | - | - | - | - | |
06 | 2.4239: Eliminate or reduce compressed air usage | $1,682 | - |
$1,170
39,410
kWh
|
$512
-
kW-mo/yr
|
- | - | - | - | - | |
07 | 2.4221: Install compressor air intakes in coolest locations | $1,643 | $500 |
$1,143
38,478
kWh
|
$500
-
kW-mo/yr
|
- | - | - | - | - | |
08 | 2.7134: Use photocell controls | $1,612 | $150 |
$838
28,239
kWh
|
$678
-
kW-mo/yr
|
- | $33 | - | $63 | - | |
09 | 2.7135: Install occupancy sensors | $555 | $825 |
$176
5,964
kWh
|
$352
-
kW-mo/yr
|
- | $5 | - | $22 | - | |
10 | 2.4314: Use synthetic lubricant | $430 | $1,000 |
$131
10,070
kWh
|
$299
-
kW-mo/yr
|
- | - | - | - | - | |
11 | 2.7144: Install spectral reflectors / delamp | $255 | $590 |
$90
3,019
kWh
|
$40
-
kW-mo/yr
|
- | $52 | - | $73 | - | |
12 | 2.7111: Reduce illumination to minimum necessary levels | $204 | $9 |
$128
4,295
kWh
|
$56
-
kW-mo/yr
|
- | $4 | - | $16 | - | |
13 | 3.5315: Lease / purchase baler; sell cardboard to recycler | $15,243 | $5,500 | - | - |
$15,243
-
lb
|
- | - | - | - | |
14 | 3.5316: Contract a wood pallet recycling company | $1,904 | $408 | - | - |
$1,904
-
lb
|
- | - | - | - | |
15 | 3.5248: Separate and recycle scrap metal to foundry or for sale | $936 | $272 | - | - |
$936
-
lb
|
- | - | - | - | |
16 | 3.5217: Reuse / recycle/ sell paper products | $612 | $2,250 | - | - |
$612
-
lb
|
- | - | - | - | |
17 | 3.5316: Contract a wood pallet recycling company | $8,967 | $1,000 | - | - | - | - | $8,967 | - | - | |
18 | 4.821: Pay bills on time to avoid late fees | $2,689 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | $2,689 | |
19 | 4.447: Automate payroll system | $1,387 | $2,500 | - | - | - | $1,387 | - | - | - | |
TOTAL RECOMMENDED | $62,655 | $35,014 |
$18,805
638,895
kWh
|
$10,657
-
kW-mo/yr
|
$18,695
-
lb
|
$2,193 | $8,967 | $649 | $2,689 | ||
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED | $49,129 | $29,915 |
$13,802
470,453
kWh
|
$6,355
-
kW-mo/yr
|
$18,695
-
lb
|
$750 | $8,967 | $560 | - | ||
Yearly Savings* | Imp'd Cost* | Electricity Usage Savings | Electricity Demand Savings | Solid Waste (non-haz) Savings | Personnel Changes Savings | Administrative Changes Savings | Ancillary Material Cost Savings | One-time Revenue or Avoided Cost Savings |
*Savings and costs are best estimates based on the center's site visit, associated engineering analysis, and typical capital and labor costs