ITAC Assessment: BD0145
ITAC logo
ITAC Assessment: BD0145
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
Assessment Year 1999
Principal Product Graduation Apparel, Choir Robes
NAICS
n/a
SIC 2384: Robes and Dressing Gowns
Sales Range $10
M
to 50
M
# of Employees 275
Plant Area 325,000
ft2
Annual Production 2,000,000
lb
Production Hrs. Annual 2,210
hrs
Location (State) Illinois

Facility Energy Cost and Usage

Source Yearly Cost Usage
Electricity Usage $203,698 2,392,438
kWh
Electricity Demand $76,142 7,833
kW-mo/yr
Electricity Fees $16,991 -
Natural Gas $68,899 27,291
MMBtu
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS -
RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* $164,417 *Non-energy impacts included in savings.
IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* $143,895

Recommendations

# Description Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Status Electricity Usage Savings Electricity Demand Savings Water Disposal Savings Other Liquid (non-haz) Savings Increase in Production Savings
01 2.7135: Install occupancy sensors $11,690 $13,200 $5,103
121,630
kWh
$6,587
-
kW-mo/yr
- - -
02 2.2414: Use waste heat from hot flue gases to preheat $3,654 $6,000 $3,654
487,691
kWh
- - - -
03 2.7142: Utilize higher efficiency lamps and/or ballasts $1,755 $6,000 $799
19,050
kWh
$956
-
kW-mo/yr
- - -
04 2.4221: Install compressor air intakes in coolest locations $632 $600 $279
6,741
kWh
$353
-
kW-mo/yr
- - -
05 2.4133: Use most efficient type of electric motors $408 $890 $210
4,982
kWh
$198
-
kW-mo/yr
- - -
06 3.4114: Replace city water with recycled water via cooling tower $11,371 $31,000 - - $11,371
-
Tgal
- -
07 3.5314: Use in-process recycling whenever possible $3,002 $11,500 - - - $3,002
-
gal
-
08 4.111: Add equipment/ operators to reduce production bottleneck $125,756 $200,000 - - - - $125,756
09 3.2176: Increase use of automation $6,149 $26,000 - - - - $6,149
TOTAL RECOMMENDED $164,417 $295,190 $10,045
640,094
kWh
$8,094
-
kW-mo/yr
$11,371
-
Tgal
$3,002
-
gal
$131,905
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED $143,895 $226,690 $10,045
640,094
kWh
$8,094
-
kW-mo/yr
- - $125,756
Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Electricity Usage Savings Electricity Demand Savings Water Disposal Savings Other Liquid (non-haz) Savings Increase in Production Savings
*Savings and costs are best estimates based on the center's site visit, associated engineering analysis, and typical capital and labor costs