| Assessment Year | 1998 |
|---|---|
| Principal Product | Safety Containers |
| NAICS |
n/a
|
| SIC | 3411: Metal Cans |
| Sales Range | $10 M to 50M |
| # of Employees | 160 |
| Plant Area |
162,660
ft2
|
| Annual Production | 450,000
pieces
|
| Production Hrs. Annual | 4,420
hrs
|
| Location (State) | Illinois |
Facility Energy Cost and Usage
| Source | Yearly Cost | Usage | Unit Cost | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Electricity Usage | $95,202 | 2,820,926 |
kWh
|
$0.034 |
| Electricity Demand | $107,464 | 9,854 |
kW-mo/yr
|
$10.91 |
| Electricity Fees | $1,766 | - |
|
- |
| Natural Gas | $86,724 | 18,967 |
MMBtu
|
$4.57 |
| TOTAL YEARLY COSTS | - | |||
| RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* | $65,369 |
See individual recommendations below
*Non-energy impacts included in savings.
|
||
| IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* | $36,428 | |||
Recommendations
| # | Description | Yearly Savings* | Imp'd Cost* | Status | Electricity Usage Savings | Electricity Demand Savings | Natural Gas Savings | Water Disposal Savings | Solid Waste (non-haz) Savings | Personnel Changes Savings | Administrative Changes Savings | By-product Production Savings |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01 | 2.2622: Replace existing chiller with high efficiency model | $32,188 | $123,000 |
$5,448
155,334
kWh
|
$7,473
-
kW-mo/yr
|
$6,316
-
MMBtu
|
- | - | - | $12,951 | - | |
| 02 | 2.2437: Recover waste heat from equipment | $3,395 | $1,500 | - | - |
$3,395
-
MMBtu
|
- | - | - | - | - | |
| 03 | 2.1321: Replace fossil fuel equipment with electrical equipment | $2,711 | $2,400 |
$3,685
117,819
kWh
|
$1,320
-
kW-mo/yr
|
$(-2,294.0)
-
MMBtu
|
- | - | - | - | - | |
| 04 | 2.4133: Use most efficient type of electric motors | $1,529 | $3,580 |
$921
27,257
kWh
|
$608
-
kW-mo/yr
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | |
| 05 | 2.7135: Install occupancy sensors | $1,186 | $700 |
$526
15,533
kWh
|
$660
-
kW-mo/yr
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | |
| 06 | 2.4221: Install compressor air intakes in coolest locations | $957 | $800 |
$360
10,551
kWh
|
$597
-
kW-mo/yr
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | |
| 07 | 2.4134: Replace electric motor with fossil fuel engine | $880 | $750 |
$331
9,965
kWh
|
$549
-
kW-mo/yr
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | |
| 08 | 2.4236: Eliminate leaks in inert gas and compressed air lines/ valves | $774 | $350 |
$291
8,792
kWh
|
$483
-
kW-mo/yr
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | |
| 09 | 2.2692: Use outside cold water source as a supply of cooling water | $755 | $300 |
$284
8,499
kWh
|
$471
-
kW-mo/yr
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | |
| 10 | 2.4231: Reduce the pressure of compressed air to the minimum required | $501 | - |
$188
5,569
kWh
|
$313
-
kW-mo/yr
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | |
| 11 | 2.7142: Utilize higher efficiency lamps and/or ballasts | $448 | $450 |
$168
4,982
kWh
|
$74
-
kW-mo/yr
|
- | - | - | - | $206 | - | |
| 12 | 2.4111: Utilize energy-efficient belts and other improved mechanisms | $374 | $360 |
$226
6,741
kWh
|
$148
-
kW-mo/yr
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | |
| 13 | 3.5315: Lease / purchase baler; sell cardboard to recycler | $10,694 | $8,000 | - | - | - | - |
$2,238
-
lb
|
- | $8,456 | - | |
| 14 | 3.5316: Contract a wood pallet recycling company | $5,275 | $240 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | $5,275 | |
| 15 | 3.4151: Minimize water usage | $982 | $1,395 | - | - | - |
$982
-
Tgal
|
- | - | - | - | |
| 16 | 4.112: Replace old machine with new automatic multi-station tool | $2,340 | $2,000 | - | - | - | - | - | $2,340 | - | - | |
| 17 | 4.821: Pay bills on time to avoid late fees | $380 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | $380 | - | |
| TOTAL RECOMMENDED | $65,369 | $145,825 |
$12,428
371,042
kWh
|
$12,696
-
kW-mo/yr
|
$7,417
-
MMBtu
|
$982
-
Tgal
|
$2,238
-
lb
|
$2,340 | $21,993 | $5,275 | ||
| TOTAL IMPLEMENTED | $36,428 | $125,660 |
$7,207
207,502
kWh
|
$9,748
-
kW-mo/yr
|
$6,316
-
MMBtu
|
- | - | - | $13,157 | - | ||
| Yearly Savings* | Imp'd Cost* | Electricity Usage Savings | Electricity Demand Savings | Natural Gas Savings | Water Disposal Savings | Solid Waste (non-haz) Savings | Personnel Changes Savings | Administrative Changes Savings | By-product Production Savings | |||
*Savings and costs are best estimates based on the center's site visit, associated engineering analysis, and typical capital and labor costs