Assessment Year | 1999 |
---|---|
Principal Product | Dairy and Non-dairy creamer product |
NAICS |
n/a
|
SIC | 2023: Dry, Condensed, and Evaporated Dairy Products |
Sales Range | $10 M to 50M |
# of Employees | 65 |
Plant Area |
30,000
ft2
|
Annual Production | 1,380,000,000
pieces
|
Production Hrs. Annual | 8,664
hrs
|
Location (State) | Arizona |
Facility Energy Cost and Usage
Source | Yearly Cost | Usage | Unit Cost | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Electricity Usage | $179,618 | 3,276,084 |
kWh
|
$0.055 |
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS | - | |||
RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* | $396,410 |
See individual recommendations below
*Non-energy impacts included in savings.
|
||
IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* | - |
Recommendations
# | Description | Yearly Savings* | Imp'd Cost* | Status | Electricity Usage Savings | Water Disposal Savings | Solid Waste (non-haz) Savings | Administrative Changes Savings | Increase in Production Savings |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01 | 2.7135: Install occupancy sensors | $522 | $1,800 | n/a |
$522
9,672
kWh
|
- | - | - | - |
02 | 2.4133: Use most efficient type of electric motors | $2,441 | $9,669 | n/a |
$2,441
44,549
kWh
|
- | - | - | - |
03 | 2.4231: Reduce the pressure of compressed air to the minimum required | $16,388 | $120 | n/a |
$16,388
299,238
kWh
|
- | - | - | - |
04 | 3.6192: Use a less expensive method of waste removal | $15,768 | $480 | n/a | - | - |
$15,768
-
lb
|
- | - |
05 | 4.231: Purchase equipment instead of leasing | $14,400 | $50,000 | n/a | - | - | - | $14,400 | - |
06 | 4.111: Add equipment/ operators to reduce production bottleneck | $346,891 | $10,000 | n/a | - |
$(-26,442.0)
-
Tgal
|
- | - | $373,333 |
TOTAL RECOMMENDED | $396,410 | $72,069 |
$19,351
353,459
kWh
|
$(-26,442.0)
-
Tgal
|
$15,768
-
lb
|
$14,400 | $373,333 | ||
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||
Yearly Savings* | Imp'd Cost* | Electricity Usage Savings | Water Disposal Savings | Solid Waste (non-haz) Savings | Administrative Changes Savings | Increase in Production Savings |
*Savings and costs are best estimates based on the center's site visit, associated engineering analysis, and typical capital and labor costs