ITAC Assessment: AS0233
ITAC logo
ITAC Assessment: AS0233
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
Assessment Year 1998
Principal Product Steel Hosereels
NAICS
n/a
SIC 3499: Fabricated Metal Products, Not Elsewhere Classified
Sales Range $10
M
to 50
M
# of Employees 90
Plant Area 20,000
ft2
Annual Production 60,000
pieces
Production Hrs. Annual 4,310
hrs
Location (State) Arizona

Facility Energy Cost and Usage

Source Yearly Cost Usage
Electricity Usage $59,182 973,329
kWh
Electricity Demand $9,112 3,108
kW-mo/yr
Electricity Fees $5,832 -
Natural Gas $51,412 9,267
MMBtu
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS -
RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* $159,986 *Non-energy impacts included in savings.
IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* $155,158

Recommendations

# Description Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Status Electricity Usage Savings Electricity Demand Savings Natural Gas Savings Personnel Changes Savings Administrative Changes Savings Ancillary Material Cost Savings
01 2.4221: Install compressor air intakes in coolest locations $508 $220 $351
7,034
kWh
$157
-
kW-mo/yr
- - - -
02 2.4231: Reduce the pressure of compressed air to the minimum required $524 $60 $363
7,327
kWh
$161
-
kW-mo/yr
- - - -
03 2.7121: Utilize daylight whenever possible in lieu of artificial light $415 $365 $415
8,499
kWh
- - - - -
04 2.7142: Utilize higher efficiency lamps and/or ballasts $2,226 $8,275 $1,415
29,015
kWh
$811
-
kW-mo/yr
- - - -
05 2.7142: Utilize higher efficiency lamps and/or ballasts $83 $87 $45
879
kWh
$8
-
kW-mo/yr
- $15 - $15
06 3.6192: Use a less expensive method of waste removal $368 $60 - - - - $368 -
07 4.111: Add equipment/ operators to reduce production bottleneck $47,175 $480 - - - $47,175 - -
08 4.812: Apply for investment incentives $704 $60 - - - - $704 -
09 4.121: Maintain clean conditions before painting $11,008 $1,480 - - $1,008
-
MMBtu
$10,000 - -
10 4.514: Re-arrange equipment layout to reduce handling costs $96,975 $150,000 - - - $96,975 - -
TOTAL RECOMMENDED $159,986 $161,087 $2,589
52,754
kWh
$1,137
-
kW-mo/yr
$1,008
-
MMBtu
$154,165 $1,072 $15
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED $155,158 $151,960 - - $1,008
-
MMBtu
$154,150 - -
Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Electricity Usage Savings Electricity Demand Savings Natural Gas Savings Personnel Changes Savings Administrative Changes Savings Ancillary Material Cost Savings
*Savings and costs are best estimates based on the center's site visit, associated engineering analysis, and typical capital and labor costs