ITAC Assessment: AS0214
ITAC logo
ITAC Assessment: AS0214
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
Assessment Year 1997
Principal Product Commercial Printing
NAICS
n/a
SIC 2752: Commercial Printing, Lithographic
Sales Range $5
M
to 10
M
# of Employees 45
Plant Area 18,000
ft2
Annual Production 5,000,000
lb
Production Hrs. Annual 8,400
hrs
Location (State) Arizona

Facility Energy Cost and Usage

Source Yearly Cost Usage
Electricity Usage $57,927 568,288
kWh
Electricity Fees $5,542 -
Natural Gas $439 41
MMBtu
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS -
RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* $38,094 *Non-energy impacts included in savings.
IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* $18,372

Recommendations

# Description Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Status Electricity Usage Savings Solid Waste (non-haz) Savings Solid Waste (haz) Savings Administrative Changes Savings By-product Production Savings
01 2.7142: Utilize higher efficiency lamps and/or ballasts $748 $771 $748
6,741
kWh
- - - -
02 2.7232: Replace existing hvac unit with high efficiency model $12,440 $6,500 $12,440
113,716
kWh
- - - -
03 2.4231: Reduce the pressure of compressed air to the minimum required $370 $60 $370
3,517
kWh
- - - -
04 2.4221: Install compressor air intakes in coolest locations $1,398 $1,360 $1,398
12,896
kWh
- - - -
05 2.7228: Avoid introducing hot, humid, or dirty air into hvac system $1,384 $320 $1,384
12,603
kWh
- - - -
06 2.2523: Reduce infiltration to refrigerated areas; isolate hot equipment from refrigerated areas $4,898 $8,400 $4,898
44,842
kWh
- - - -
07 2.4133: Use most efficient type of electric motors $1,805 $901 $1,805
16,413
kWh
- - - -
08 3.6192: Use a less expensive method of waste removal $1,000 $30 - - - $1,000 -
09 3.6192: Use a less expensive method of waste removal $4,811 $60 - - - $4,811 -
10 3.5316: Contract a wood pallet recycling company $3,900 - - $300
-
lb
- - $3,600
11 3.6192: Use a less expensive method of waste removal $1,440 $60 - - - $1,440 -
12 4.652: Replace existing equipment with more suitable substitutes $3,900 $7,500 - - $3,900
-
lb
- -
TOTAL RECOMMENDED $38,094 $25,962 $23,043
210,728
kWh
$300
-
lb
$3,900
-
lb
$7,251 $3,600
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED $18,372 $10,712 $4,321
39,567
kWh
$300
-
lb
$3,900
-
lb
$6,251 $3,600
Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Electricity Usage Savings Solid Waste (non-haz) Savings Solid Waste (haz) Savings Administrative Changes Savings By-product Production Savings
*Savings and costs are best estimates based on the center's site visit, associated engineering analysis, and typical capital and labor costs