ITAC Assessment: AS0012
ITAC logo
ITAC Assessment: AS0012
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
Assessment Year 1990
Principal Product BUSINESS FORMS
NAICS
n/a
SIC 2752: Commercial Printing, Lithographic
Sales Range $5
M
to 10
M
# of Employees 80
Plant Area
n/a
Annual Production 218,000
pieces
Production Hrs. Annual 6,240
hrs
Location (State) Arizona

Facility Energy Cost and Usage

Source Yearly Cost Usage
Electricity Usage $58,731 775,205
kWh
Natural Gas $706 93
MMBtu
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS -
RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* $21,103 *Non-energy impacts included in savings.
IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* $5,438

Recommendations

# Description Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Status Electricity Usage Savings
01 2.7422: Plant trees or shrubs near windows to shield from sunlight $2,892 $1,800 $2,892
38,101
kWh
02 2.2511: Insulate bare equipment $1,277 $63 $1,277
16,999
kWh
03 2.7447: Install vinyl strip / high speed / air curtain doors $2,531 $1,500 $2,531
33,411
kWh
04 2.7142: Utilize higher efficiency lamps and/or ballasts $2,435 $2,241 $2,435
32,239
kWh
05 2.7123: Keep lamps and reflectors clean $10,139 $10,940 $10,139
133,939
kWh
06 2.6232: Install set-back timers $1,718 $450 $1,718
22,567
kWh
07 2.4133: Use most efficient type of electric motors $111 $107 $111
1,465
kWh
TOTAL RECOMMENDED $21,103 $17,101 $21,103
278,721
kWh
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED $5,438 $4,148 $5,438
71,805
kWh
Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Electricity Usage Savings
*Savings and costs are best estimates based on the center's site visit, associated engineering analysis, and typical capital and labor costs