ITAC Assessment: AR0160
ITAC logo
ITAC Assessment: AR0160
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
Assessment Year 1999
Principal Product Aluminum extrusions
NAICS
n/a
SIC 3356: Rolling, Drawing, and Extruding of Nonferrous Metals, Except Copper and Aluminum
Sales Range $10
M
to 50
M
# of Employees 45
Plant Area 96,200
ft2
Annual Production 12,000,000
lb
Production Hrs. Annual 6,022
hrs
Location (State) Arkansas

Facility Energy Cost and Usage

Source Yearly Cost Usage
Electricity Usage $93,647 2,730,950
kWh
Electricity Demand $68,107 9,606
kW-mo/yr
Natural Gas $13,685 2,831
MMBtu
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS -
RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* $253,431 *Non-energy impacts included in savings.
IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* $133,383

Recommendations

# Description Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Status Electricity Usage Savings Electricity Demand Savings Solid Waste (non-haz) Savings Personnel Changes Savings Water Consumption Savings
01 2.7142: Utilize higher efficiency lamps and/or ballasts $2,689 $3,628 $1,877
55,100
kWh
$812
-
kW-mo/yr
- - -
02 2.4133: Use most efficient type of electric motors $272 $1,750 $221
2,931
kWh
$51
-
kW-mo/yr
- - -
03 2.4236: Eliminate leaks in inert gas and compressed air lines/ valves $1,374 $50 $1,080
23,154
kWh
$294
-
kW-mo/yr
- - -
04 2.4221: Install compressor air intakes in coolest locations $1,246 $450 $981
21,102
kWh
$265
-
kW-mo/yr
- - -
05 3.4111: Use closed cycle process to minimize waste water production $9,048 $5,000 $(-5,105.0)
(-150,059)
kWh
$(-4,333.0)
-
kW-mo/yr
- - $18,486
-
Tgal
06 3.1192: Reduce scrap production $120,000 $80,000 - - $120,000
-
lb
- -
07 4.513: Re-arrange equipment layout to reduce labor costs $118,802 $300 - - - $118,802 -
TOTAL RECOMMENDED $253,431 $91,178 $(-946.0)
(-47,772)
kWh
$(-2,911.0)
-
kW-mo/yr
$120,000
-
lb
$118,802 $18,486
-
Tgal
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED $133,383 $90,428 $(-1,927.0)
(-68,874)
kWh
$(-3,176.0)
-
kW-mo/yr
$120,000
-
lb
- $18,486
-
Tgal
Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Electricity Usage Savings Electricity Demand Savings Solid Waste (non-haz) Savings Personnel Changes Savings Water Consumption Savings
*Savings and costs are best estimates based on the center's site visit, associated engineering analysis, and typical capital and labor costs