ITAC Assessment: AR0124
ITAC logo
ITAC Assessment: AR0124
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
Assessment Year 1997
Principal Product Foam Rubber Products
NAICS
n/a
SIC 3069: Fabricated Rubber Products, Not Elsewhere Classified
Sales Range $10
M
to 50
M
# of Employees 320
Plant Area 211,000
ft2
Annual Production 14,000,000
lb
Production Hrs. Annual 6,600
hrs
Location (State) Arkansas

Facility Energy Cost and Usage

Source Yearly Cost Usage
Electricity Usage $437,745 15,273,447
kWh
Electricity Demand $504,349 35,663
kW-mo/yr
Natural Gas $42,076 10,433
MMBtu
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS -
RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* $42,101 *Non-energy impacts included in savings.
IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* $7,706

Recommendations

# Description Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Status Electricity Usage Savings Water Disposal Savings Solid Waste (non-haz) Savings Personnel Changes Savings
01 2.4236: Eliminate leaks in inert gas and compressed air lines/ valves $757 $120 $757
7,913
kWh
- - -
02 2.7142: Utilize higher efficiency lamps and/or ballasts $2,334 $586 $2,334
39,566
kWh
- - -
03 2.7111: Reduce illumination to minimum necessary levels $2,547 $605 $2,547
41,032
kWh
- - -
04 2.2523: Reduce infiltration to refrigerated areas; isolate hot equipment from refrigerated areas $2,617 $100 $2,617
90,270
kWh
- - -
05 2.4111: Utilize energy-efficient belts and other improved mechanisms $1,903 - $1,903
34,877
kWh
- - -
06 2.4221: Install compressor air intakes in coolest locations $376 $100 $376
7,034
kWh
- - -
07 2.4133: Use most efficient type of electric motors $1,103 $1,238 $1,103
19,930
kWh
- - -
08 3.4156: Use flow control valves on equipment to optimize water use $950 $100 - $950
-
Tgal
- -
09 3.6192: Use a less expensive method of waste removal $3,514 - - - $3,514
-
lb
-
10 4.441: Install automatic packing equipment $26,000 $2,500 - - - $26,000
TOTAL RECOMMENDED $42,101 $5,349 $11,637
240,622
kWh
$950
-
Tgal
$3,514
-
lb
$26,000
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED $7,706 $1,658 $6,756
160,024
kWh
$950
-
Tgal
- -
Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Electricity Usage Savings Water Disposal Savings Solid Waste (non-haz) Savings Personnel Changes Savings
*Savings and costs are best estimates based on the center's site visit, associated engineering analysis, and typical capital and labor costs