ITAC Assessment: AR0055
ITAC logo
ITAC Assessment: AR0055
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
Assessment Year 1995
Principal Product Rigid Foam Insulation
NAICS
n/a
SIC 3086: Plastics Foam Products
Sales Range $10
M
to 50
M
# of Employees 36
Plant Area 150,000
ft2
Annual Production 100,000,000
pieces
Production Hrs. Annual 3,129
hrs
Location (State) Texas

Facility Energy Cost and Usage

Source Yearly Cost Usage
Electricity Usage $112,243 2,469,226
kWh
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS -
RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* $89,736 *Non-energy impacts included in savings.
IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* $3,275

Recommendations

# Description Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Status Electricity Usage Savings Solid Waste (non-haz) Savings
01 2.4133: Use most efficient type of electric motors $1,899 $4,070 $1,899
36,049
kWh
-
02 2.7142: Utilize higher efficiency lamps and/or ballasts $481 $347 $481
8,499
kWh
-
03 2.4111: Utilize energy-efficient belts and other improved mechanisms $185 - $185
3,810
kWh
-
04 2.4221: Install compressor air intakes in coolest locations $259 $200 $259
4,982
kWh
-
05 2.7111: Reduce illumination to minimum necessary levels $451 $30 $451
12,016
kWh
-
06 3.5311: Recover and reuse waste material $86,461 $51,250 - $86,461
-
lb
TOTAL RECOMMENDED $89,736 $55,897 $3,275
65,356
kWh
$86,461
-
lb
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED $3,275 $4,647 $3,275
65,356
kWh
-
Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Electricity Usage Savings Solid Waste (non-haz) Savings
*Savings and costs are best estimates based on the center's site visit, associated engineering analysis, and typical capital and labor costs