ITAC Assessment: WV0272
ITAC logo
ITAC Assessment: WV0272
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
Assessment Year 2003
Principal Product Meat Processing
NAICS 311611: Animal (except Poultry) Slaughtering
SIC 2011: Meat Packing Plants
Sales Range $10
M
to 50
M
# of Employees 180
Plant Area 60,000
ft2
Annual Production 5,000,000
lb
Production Hrs. Annual 2,080
hrs
Location (State) Ohio

Facility Energy Cost and Usage

Source Yearly Cost Usage
Electricity Usage $152,344 4,968,000
kWh
Electricity Demand $117,152 10,128
kW-mo/yr
Electricity Fees $1,440 -
Natural Gas $107,904 25,082
MMBtu
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS -
RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* $67,220 *Non-energy impacts included in savings.
IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* $41,732

Recommendations

# Description Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Status Electricity Usage Savings Electricity Demand Savings Natural Gas Savings Personnel Changes Savings
01 2.3131: Reschedule plant operations or reduce load to avoid peaks $19,526 - - $19,526
-
kW-mo/yr
- -
02 2.4239: Eliminate or reduce compressed air usage $3,112 $80 $586
18,944
kWh
$2,526
-
kW-mo/yr
- -
03 2.2511: Insulate bare equipment $12,184 $721 $8,061
260,389
kWh
$4,123
-
kW-mo/yr
- -
04 2.6221: Use most efficient equipment at it's maximum capacity and less efficient equipment only when necessary $5,265 $980 $3,209
103,722
kWh
$2,536
-
kW-mo/yr
- $(-480.0)
05 2.2511: Insulate bare equipment $4,369 $621 - - $4,369
-
MMBtu
-
06 2.7142: Utilize higher efficiency lamps and/or ballasts $5,533 $9,240 $1,887
60,853
kWh
$3,646
-
kW-mo/yr
- -
07 2.2628: Utilize a less expensive cooling method $3,209 $1,789 $1,015
32,909
kWh
$2,194
-
kW-mo/yr
- -
08 2.4111: Utilize energy-efficient belts and other improved mechanisms $3,519 $675 $1,116
36,039
kWh
$2,403
-
kW-mo/yr
- -
09 2.2414: Use waste heat from hot flue gases to preheat $1,730 $1,700 - - $1,730
-
MMBtu
-
10 2.4236: Eliminate leaks in inert gas and compressed air lines/ valves $5,390 $200 $2,213
71,455
kWh
$3,177
-
kW-mo/yr
- -
11 2.7111: Reduce illumination to minimum necessary levels $1,120 $240 $411
13,273
kWh
$709
-
kW-mo/yr
- -
12 2.4314: Use synthetic lubricant $1,058 $240 $335
10,841
kWh
$723
-
kW-mo/yr
- -
13 2.4231: Reduce the pressure of compressed air to the minimum required $1,205 $80 $317
10,255
kWh
$888
-
kW-mo/yr
- -
TOTAL RECOMMENDED $67,220 $16,566 $19,150
618,680
kWh
$42,451
-
kW-mo/yr
$6,099
-
MMBtu
$(-480.0)
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED $41,732 $14,546 $18,153
586,463
kWh
$19,690
-
kW-mo/yr
$4,369
-
MMBtu
$(-480.0)
Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Electricity Usage Savings Electricity Demand Savings Natural Gas Savings Personnel Changes Savings
*Savings and costs are best estimates based on the center's site visit, associated engineering analysis, and typical capital and labor costs