ITAC Assessment: WV0239
ITAC logo
ITAC Assessment: WV0239
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
Assessment Year 2002
Principal Product Metal coatings
NAICS
n/a
SIC 3471: Electroplating, Plating, Polishing, Anodizing, and Coloring
Sales Range $10
M
to 50
M
# of Employees 185
Plant Area 140,000
ft2
Annual Production 200,000
pieces
Production Hrs. Annual 5,100
hrs
Location (State) Ohio

Facility Energy Cost and Usage

Source Yearly Cost Usage
Electricity Usage $338,529 5,249,460
kWh
Electricity Demand $85,065 11,862
kW-mo/yr
Natural Gas $708,124 73,568
MMBtu
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS -
RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* $281,483 *Non-energy impacts included in savings.
IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* $48,272

Recommendations

# Description Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Status Electricity Usage Savings Electricity Demand Savings Natural Gas Savings Solid Waste (non-haz) Savings Personnel Changes Savings Administrative Changes Savings
01 2.7142: Utilize higher efficiency lamps and/or ballasts $8,858 $13,440 $6,992
107,489
kWh
$1,866
-
kW-mo/yr
- - - -
02 2.4111: Utilize energy-efficient belts and other improved mechanisms $1,082 $500 $800
12,306
kWh
$282
-
kW-mo/yr
- - - -
03 2.2414: Use waste heat from hot flue gases to preheat $14,589 $4,390 - - $14,589
-
MMBtu
- - -
04 2.2511: Insulate bare equipment $10,526 $1,582 - - $10,526
-
MMBtu
- - -
05 2.2515: Use optimum thickness insulation $3,072 $1,080 - - $3,072
-
MMBtu
- - -
06 2.7142: Utilize higher efficiency lamps and/or ballasts $2,529 - $2,058
31,644
kWh
$471
-
kW-mo/yr
- - - -
07 2.2628: Utilize a less expensive cooling method $1,408 $1,044 $273
36,625
kWh
$1,135
-
kW-mo/yr
- - - -
08 2.2437: Recover waste heat from equipment $5,932 $5,580 - - $5,932
-
MMBtu
- - -
09 2.2437: Recover waste heat from equipment $18,443 $140 - - $18,443
-
MMBtu
- - -
10 2.6221: Use most efficient equipment at it's maximum capacity and less efficient equipment only when necessary $5,680 $300 $4,770
73,250
kWh
$1,090
-
kW-mo/yr
- - $(-180.0) -
11 3.6193: Install equipment (eg compactor) to reduce disposal costs $174,164 $15,000 - - - $174,164
-
lb
- -
12 3.5316: Contract a wood pallet recycling company $7,200 $100 - - - $7,200
-
lb
- -
13 4.652: Replace existing equipment with more suitable substitutes $28,000 $12,000 - - - - - $28,000
TOTAL RECOMMENDED $281,483 $55,156 $14,893
261,314
kWh
$4,844
-
kW-mo/yr
$52,562
-
MMBtu
$181,364
-
lb
$(-180.0) $28,000
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED $48,272 $16,604 $14,893
261,314
kWh
$4,844
-
kW-mo/yr
$21,515
-
MMBtu
$7,200
-
lb
$(-180.0) -
Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Electricity Usage Savings Electricity Demand Savings Natural Gas Savings Solid Waste (non-haz) Savings Personnel Changes Savings Administrative Changes Savings
*Savings and costs are best estimates based on the center's site visit, associated engineering analysis, and typical capital and labor costs