ITAC Assessment: WV0190
ITAC logo
ITAC Assessment: WV0190
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
Assessment Year 2000
Principal Product Aluminium die casting
NAICS
n/a
SIC 3363: Aluminum Die-Castings
Sales Range $10
M
to 50
M
# of Employees 170
Plant Area 157,500
ft2
Annual Production 4,452,600
pieces
Production Hrs. Annual 7,440
hrs
Location (State) Ohio

Facility Energy Cost and Usage

Source Yearly Cost Usage
Electricity Usage $408,898 24,805,100
kWh
Electricity Demand $696,877 39,376
kW-mo/yr
Electricity Fees $284,953 -
Natural Gas $521,455 126,212
MMBtu
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS -
RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* $2,262,686 *Non-energy impacts included in savings.
IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* $349,376

Recommendations

# Description Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Status Electricity Usage Savings Natural Gas Savings Solid Waste (non-haz) Savings Administrative Changes Savings
01 2.1116: Improve combustion control capability $204,769 $34,000 - $204,769
-
MMBtu
- -
02 2.4146: Use adjustable frequency drive or multiple speed motors on existing system $9,748 $9,600 $9,748
173,212
kWh
- - -
03 2.7245: Use direct air supply to exhaust hoods $24,565 $9,120 $24,565
1,743,259
kWh
- - -
04 2.2514: Cover open tanks $11,730 $5,760 $11,730
189,918
kWh
- - -
05 2.7243: Improve air circulation with destratification fans / other methods $920 $850 $920
66,237
kWh
- - -
06 2.4111: Utilize energy-efficient belts and other improved mechanisms $2,883 $780 $2,883
39,859
kWh
- - -
07 2.7142: Utilize higher efficiency lamps and/or ballasts $63,174 $66,000 $63,174
1,031,653
kWh
- - -
08 2.7144: Install spectral reflectors / delamp $2,768 $2,868 $2,768
18,171
kWh
- - -
09 2.4231: Reduce the pressure of compressed air to the minimum required $22,514 $30 $22,514
400,645
kWh
- - -
10 2.4131: Size electric motors for peak operating efficiency $52,195 $13,550 $52,195
852,286
kWh
- - -
11 3.4111: Use closed cycle process to minimize waste water production $66,820 $78,000 - - $66,820
-
lb
-
12 4.126: Install sensors to detect defects $1,785,600 $2,400,000 - - - $1,785,600
13 4.111: Add equipment/ operators to reduce production bottleneck $15,000 $6,240 - - - $15,000
TOTAL RECOMMENDED $2,262,686 $2,626,798 $190,497
4,515,240
kWh
$204,769
-
MMBtu
$66,820
-
lb
$1,800,600
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED $349,376 $184,540 $77,787
1,261,430
kWh
$204,769
-
MMBtu
$66,820
-
lb
-
Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Electricity Usage Savings Natural Gas Savings Solid Waste (non-haz) Savings Administrative Changes Savings
*Savings and costs are best estimates based on the center's site visit, associated engineering analysis, and typical capital and labor costs