ITAC Assessment: WV0151
ITAC logo
ITAC Assessment: WV0151
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
Assessment Year 1998
Principal Product Hand made glass
NAICS
n/a
SIC 3229: Pressed and Blown Glass and Glassware, Not Elsewhere Classified
Sales Range $5
M
to 10
M
# of Employees 75
Plant Area 52,322
ft2
Annual Production 322,000
pieces
Production Hrs. Annual 3,600
hrs
Location (State) West Virginia

Facility Energy Cost and Usage

Source Yearly Cost Usage
Electricity Usage $62,921 1,351,407
kWh
Natural Gas $425,808 134,796
MMBtu
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS -
RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* $68,730 *Non-energy impacts included in savings.
IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* $3,650

Recommendations

# Description Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Status Electricity Usage Savings Natural Gas Savings Other Gas Savings Water Disposal Savings Solid Waste (non-haz) Savings Personnel Changes Savings
01 2.7142: Utilize higher efficiency lamps and/or ballasts $413 $281 $413
11,723
kWh
- - - - -
02 2.4111: Utilize energy-efficient belts and other improved mechanisms $82 $100 $82
1,758
kWh
- - - - -
03 2.2437: Recover waste heat from equipment $4,914 $1,890 - $4,914
-
MMBtu
- - - -
04 2.2514: Cover open tanks $18,688 $3,164 - $18,688
-
MMBtu
- - - -
05 2.1331: Burn a less expensive grade of fuel $1,820 $2,400 - - $1,820
-
MMBtu
- - -
06 2.2511: Insulate bare equipment $611 $83 - $611
-
MMBtu
- - - -
07 2.4314: Use synthetic lubricant $124 $213 $124
2,931
kWh
- - - - -
08 2.4133: Use most efficient type of electric motors $970 $2,310 $970
61,547
kWh
- - - - -
09 3.6193: Install equipment (eg compactor) to reduce disposal costs $10,408 $11,000 - - - - $10,408
-
lb
-
10 3.4111: Use closed cycle process to minimize waste water production $1,450 $326 - - - $1,450
-
Tgal
- -
11 4.432: Cross-train personnel to avoid lost time $29,250 $45 - - - - - $29,250
TOTAL RECOMMENDED $68,730 $21,812 $1,589
77,959
kWh
$24,213
-
MMBtu
$1,820
-
MMBtu
$1,450
-
Tgal
$10,408
-
lb
$29,250
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED $3,650 $3,313 $1,589
77,959
kWh
$611
-
MMBtu
- $1,450
-
Tgal
- -
Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Electricity Usage Savings Natural Gas Savings Other Gas Savings Water Disposal Savings Solid Waste (non-haz) Savings Personnel Changes Savings
*Savings and costs are best estimates based on the center's site visit, associated engineering analysis, and typical capital and labor costs