Assessment Year | 2005 |
---|---|
Principal Product | Greet. Cards |
NAICS | 323111: Commercial Printing (except Screen and Books) |
SIC | 2759: Commercial Printing, Not Elsewhere Classified |
Sales Range | $10 M to 50M |
# of Employees | 220 |
Plant Area |
100,000
ft2
|
Annual Production | 18,000
ton
|
Production Hrs. Annual | 6,000
hrs
|
Location (State) | Wisconsin |
Facility Energy Cost and Usage
Source | Yearly Cost | Usage | Unit Cost | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Electricity Usage | $129,682 | 4,100,580 |
kWh
|
$0.032 |
Electricity Demand | $81,391 | 10,437 |
kW-mo/yr
|
$7.80 |
Natural Gas | $40,932 | 6,430 |
MMBtu
|
$6.37 |
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS | - | |||
RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* | $47,626 |
See individual recommendations below
*Non-energy impacts included in savings.
|
||
IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* | $9,729 |
Recommendations
# | Description | Yearly Savings* | Imp'd Cost* | Status | Electricity Usage Savings | Electricity Demand Savings | Natural Gas Savings |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01 | 2.7273: Install desiccant humidity control system | $23,636 | $25,000 |
$21,932
656,648
kWh
|
$1,704
-
kW-mo/yr
|
- | |
02 | 2.2621: Modify refrigeration system to operate at a lower pressure | $12,939 | $15,000 |
$7,071
211,702
kWh
|
$5,868
-
kW-mo/yr
|
- | |
03 | 2.7243: Improve air circulation with destratification fans / other methods | $7,911 | $5,000 | - | - |
$7,911
-
MMBtu
|
|
04 | 2.4312: Improve lubrication practices | $1,322 | $2,340 |
$1,108
33,160
kWh
|
$214
-
kW-mo/yr
|
- | |
05 | 2.7135: Install occupancy sensors | $1,112 | $1,680 |
$1,112
33,304
kWh
|
- | - | |
06 | 2.4111: Utilize energy-efficient belts and other improved mechanisms | $706 | $1,244 |
$484
13,427
kWh
|
$222
-
kW-mo/yr
|
- | |
TOTAL RECOMMENDED | $47,626 | $50,264 |
$31,707
948,241
kWh
|
$8,008
-
kW-mo/yr
|
$7,911
-
MMBtu
|
||
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED | $9,729 | $7,924 |
$1,596
46,731
kWh
|
$222
-
kW-mo/yr
|
$7,911
-
MMBtu
|
||
Yearly Savings* | Imp'd Cost* | Electricity Usage Savings | Electricity Demand Savings | Natural Gas Savings |
*Savings and costs are best estimates based on the center's site visit, associated engineering analysis, and typical capital and labor costs