Assessment Year | 2002 |
---|---|
Principal Product | Papaerboard |
NAICS |
n/a
|
SIC | 2631: Paperboard Mills |
Sales Range | $50 M to 100M |
# of Employees | 170 |
Plant Area |
554,250
ft2
|
Annual Production | 324,000,000
lb
|
Production Hrs. Annual | 8,520
hrs
|
Location (State) | Wisconsin |
Facility Energy Cost and Usage
Source | Yearly Cost | Usage | Unit Cost | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Electricity Usage | $1,656,743 | 66,352,418 |
kWh
|
$0.025 |
Electricity Demand | $104,185 | 109,719 |
kW-mo/yr
|
$0.95 |
Electricity Fees | $260,760 | - |
|
- |
Natural Gas | $4,891,208 | 770,553 |
MMBtu
|
$6.35 |
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS | - | |||
RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* | $203,897 |
See individual recommendations below
*Non-energy impacts included in savings.
|
||
IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* | $6,645 |
Recommendations
# | Description | Yearly Savings* | Imp'd Cost* | Status | Electricity Usage Savings | Electricity Demand Savings | Natural Gas Savings | Water Disposal Savings | Personnel Changes Savings |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01 | 2.3415: Use a fossil fuel engine to cogenerate electricity or motive power; and utilize heat | $107,793 | $715,000 |
$123,420
4,675,000
kWh
|
$127,908
-
kW-mo/yr
|
$(-143,535.0)
-
MMBtu
|
- | - | |
02 | 2.4111: Utilize energy-efficient belts and other improved mechanisms | $51,405 | $31,028 |
$32,706
1,237,524
kWh
|
$18,699
-
kW-mo/yr
|
- | - | - | |
03 | 3.3132: Use reverse osmosis to concentrate material | $37,726 | $40,000 | - | - | - |
$38,376
-
Tgal
|
$(-650.0) | |
04 | 2.7142: Utilize higher efficiency lamps and/or ballasts | $6,645 | $21,689 |
$4,744
179,712
kWh
|
$1,901
-
kW-mo/yr
|
- | - | - | |
05 | 2.7142: Utilize higher efficiency lamps and/or ballasts | $328 | - |
$234
8,986
kWh
|
$94
-
kW-mo/yr
|
- | - | - | |
TOTAL RECOMMENDED | $203,897 | $807,717 |
$161,104
6,101,222
kWh
|
$148,602
-
kW-mo/yr
|
$(-143,535.0)
-
MMBtu
|
$38,376
-
Tgal
|
$(-650.0) | ||
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED | $6,645 | $21,689 |
$4,744
179,712
kWh
|
$1,901
-
kW-mo/yr
|
- | - | - |
*Savings and costs are best estimates based on the center's site visit, associated engineering analysis, and typical capital and labor costs