ITAC Assessment: WI0302
ITAC logo
ITAC Assessment: WI0302
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
Assessment Year 1997
Principal Product Cold Drawn Steel Bars
NAICS
n/a
SIC 3316: Cold-Rolled Steel Sheet, Strip, and Bars
Sales Range $10
M
to 50
M
# of Employees 191
Plant Area 330,000
ft2
Annual Production 100,000
ton
Production Hrs. Annual 5,500
hrs
Location (State) Illinois

Facility Energy Cost and Usage

Source Yearly Cost Usage
Electricity Usage $300,589 7,883,060
kWh
Electricity Demand $291,090 20,739
kW-mo/yr
Electricity Fees $20,836 -
Natural Gas $350,355 114,441
MMBtu
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS -
RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* $344,328 *Non-energy impacts included in savings.
IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* $12,327

Recommendations

# Description Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Status Electricity Usage Savings Electricity Demand Savings Natural Gas Savings Water Disposal Savings Solid Waste (non-haz) Savings Solid Waste (haz) Savings Personnel Changes Savings Primary Raw Material Savings
01 2.3415: Use a fossil fuel engine to cogenerate electricity or motive power; and utilize heat $285,742 $770,000 $243,210
6,050,117
kWh
$195,096
-
kW-mo/yr
$(-144,864.0)
-
MMBtu
- - - $(-7,700.0) -
02 3.4114: Replace city water with recycled water via cooling tower $19,558 $25,000 $(-5,283.0)
(-82,063)
kWh
- - $25,341
-
Tgal
- - $(-500.0) -
03 3.6193: Install equipment (eg compactor) to reduce disposal costs $17,370 - - - - - $17,370
-
lb
- - -
04 3.6193: Install equipment (eg compactor) to reduce disposal costs $1,350 $5,000 - - - - - $1,350
-
lb
- -
05 2.1233: Analyze flue gas for proper air/fuel ratio $6,522 $500 - - $6,522
-
MMBtu
- - - - -
06 3.3122: Use filtration, centrifuging to remove contaminants $6,051 $7,000 - - - - - - - $6,051
07 2.4111: Utilize energy-efficient belts and other improved mechanisms $5,805 - $3,220
80,012
kWh
$2,585
-
kW-mo/yr
- - - - - -
08 2.4146: Use adjustable frequency drive or multiple speed motors on existing system $1,649 $5,500 $1,649
41,032
kWh
- - - - - - -
09 2.7135: Install occupancy sensors $281 $600 $281
7,034
kWh
- - - - - - -
TOTAL RECOMMENDED $344,328 $813,600 $243,077
6,096,132
kWh
$197,681
-
kW-mo/yr
$(-138,342.0)
-
MMBtu
$25,341
-
Tgal
$17,370
-
lb
$1,350
-
lb
$(-8,200.0) $6,051
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED $12,327 $500 $3,220
80,012
kWh
$2,585
-
kW-mo/yr
$6,522
-
MMBtu
- - - - -
Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Electricity Usage Savings Electricity Demand Savings Natural Gas Savings Water Disposal Savings Solid Waste (non-haz) Savings Solid Waste (haz) Savings Personnel Changes Savings Primary Raw Material Savings
*Savings and costs are best estimates based on the center's site visit, associated engineering analysis, and typical capital and labor costs