| Assessment Year | 2014 |
|---|---|
| Principal Product | Coil Steel Processing |
| NAICS | 332812: Metal Coating, Engraving (except Jewelry and Silverware), and Allied Services to Manufacturers |
| SIC | 3479: Coating, Engraving, and Allied Services, Not Elsewhere Classified |
| Sales Range | $10 M to 50M |
| # of Employees | 96 |
| Plant Area |
160,000
ft2
|
| Annual Production | 130,000
ton
|
| Production Hrs. Annual | 6,000
hrs
|
| Location (State) | Michigan |
Facility Energy Cost and Usage
| Source | Yearly Cost | Usage | Unit Cost | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Electricity Usage | $844,097 | 8,270,143 |
kWh
|
$0.10 |
| Natural Gas | $993,745 | 204,333 |
MMBtu
|
$4.86 |
| Other Gas | $339,137 | 103,260 |
MMBtu
|
$3.28 |
| Other Energy | $206,066 | 19,510 |
MMBtu
|
$10.56 |
| TOTAL YEARLY COSTS | - | |||
| RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* | $466,064 |
See individual recommendations below
*Non-energy impacts included in savings.
|
||
| IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* | $6,638 | |||
Recommendations
| # | Description | Yearly Savings* | Imp'd Cost* | Status | Electricity Usage Savings | Natural Gas Savings | Other Gas Savings |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01 | 2.3413: Burn fossil fuel to produce steam to drive a steam turbine-generator and use steam exhaust for heat | $216,000 | $500,000 |
$263,000
2,580,000
kWh
|
$(-47,000.0)
-
MMBtu
|
- | |
| 02 | 2.3412: Use waste heat to produce steam to drive a steam turbine-generator | $71,820 | $133,000 |
$71,820
798,000
kWh
|
- | - | |
| 03 | 2.1311: Replace electrically-operated equipment with fossil fuel equipment | $67,306 | $80,000 |
$87,670
858,670
kWh
|
$(-20,364.0)
-
MMBtu
|
- | |
| 04 | 2.2163: Use minimum steam operating pressure | $6,638 | $5,000 | - |
$6,638
-
MMBtu
|
- | |
| 05 | 2.1336: Install equipment to utilize waste fuel | $104,300 | $208,000 | - | - |
$104,300
-
MMBtu
|
|
| TOTAL RECOMMENDED | $466,064 | $926,000 |
$422,490
4,236,670
kWh
|
$(-60,726.0)
-
MMBtu
|
$104,300
-
MMBtu
|
||
| TOTAL IMPLEMENTED | $6,638 | $5,000 | - |
$6,638
-
MMBtu
|
- | ||
*Savings and costs are best estimates based on the center's site visit, associated engineering analysis, and typical capital and labor costs